Chesapeake Energy Corporation Reports Financial and Operational Results for the 2011 Fourth Quarter and Full Year

Company Reports 2011 Fourth Quarter Net Income to Common
Stockholders of $429 Million, or $0.63 per Fully Diluted Common Share,
on Revenue of $2.7 Billion; Company Reports Adjusted Net Income
Available to Common Stockholders of $394 Million, or $0.58 per Fully
Diluted Common Share, and Adjusted Ebitda and Operating Cash Flow of
$1.3 Billion
Company Reports 2011 Full Year Net Income to Common Stockholders
of $1.6 Billion, or $2.32 per Fully Diluted Common Share, on Revenue of
$11.6 Billion; Company Reports Adjusted Net Income Available to Common
Stockholders of $1.9 Billion, or $2.80 per Fully Diluted Common Share,
Adjusted Ebitda of $5.4 Billion and Operating Cash Flow of $5.3 Billion
2011 Full Year Production Totals 1.194 Tcfe for an Average of
3.272 Bcfe per Day, an Increase of 15% Year over Year; 2011 Full Year
Liquids Production Increases 72%, or Approximately 36,000 Barrels per
Day, to Average Approximately 87,000 Barrels per Day
2011 Year-End Proved Reserves Reach 18.8 Tcfe; Company Adds Proved
Reserves of 5.6 Tcfe through the Drillbit at a Drilling and Completion
Cost on Proved Properties of $1.08 per Mcfe
Chesapeake′s Current Natural Gas Curtailments Reach Approximately
1.0 Bcf per Day of Gross Operated Production
Chesapeake Energy Corporation (NYSE:CHK) today announced financial and
operational results for the 2011 fourth quarter and full year. For the
2011 fourth quarter, Chesapeake reported net income to common
stockholders of $429 million ($0.63 per fully diluted common share),
ebitda of $1.375 billion (defined as net income before income taxes,
interest expense, and depreciation, depletion and amortization) and
operating cash flow of $1.311 billion (defined as cash flow from
operating activities before changes in assets and liabilities) on
revenue of $2.727 billion and production of 331 billion cubic feet of
natural gas equivalent (bcfe). For the 2011 full year, Chesapeake
reported net income to common stockholders of $1.570 billion ($2.32 per
fully diluted common share), ebitda of $4.847 billion and operating cash
flow of $5.309 billion on revenue of $11.635 billion and production of
1.194 trillion cubic feet of natural gas equivalent (tcfe).
The company′s 2011 fourth quarter and full year results include realized
natural gas and liquids hedging gains of $315 million and $1.554
billion, respectively. The results also include various items that are
typically not included in published estimates of the company′s financial
results by certain securities analysts. Excluding the items detailed
below, for the 2011 fourth quarter, Chesapeake reported adjusted net
income to common stockholders of $394 million ($0.58 per fully diluted
common share) and adjusted ebitda of $1.308 billion, and for the 2011
full year, Chesapeake reported adjusted net income to common
stockholders of $1.936 billion ($2.80 per fully diluted common share)
and adjusted ebitda of $5.406 billion. The primary excluded items and
their effects on the 2011 fourth quarter and full year reported results
are detailed as follows:
a net unrealized after-tax mark-to-market loss of $207 million for the
fourth quarter and $486 million for the full year resulting from the
company′s natural gas, liquids and interest rate hedging programs;
a net after-tax gain of $242 million for the fourth quarter and $238
million for the full year related to sales and impairments of certain
of the company′s fixed assets; and
a net after-tax loss of $118 million for the full year related to the
purchase or exchange of certain of the company′s senior notes and a
related loss on foreign currency derivatives.
A reconciliation of operating cash flow, ebitda, adjusted ebitda and
adjusted net income to comparable financial measures calculated in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles is presented on
pages 19 ? 23 of this release.
Key Operational and Financial Statistics Summarized
The table below summarizes Chesapeake′s key results during the 2011
fourth quarter and compares them to results during the 2011 third
quarter and the 2010 fourth quarter and also compares the 2011 full year
to the 2010 full year.
? | ? | Three Months Ended | ? | ? | Full Year Ended | ||||||||||||
| 12/31/11 | ? | 9/30/11 | ? | 12/31/10 | 12/31/11 | ? | 12/31/10 | ||||||||||
Average daily production (in mmcfe)(a) | 3,596 | 3,329 | 2,920 | 3,272 | 2,836 | ||||||||||||
Natural gas equivalent production (in bcfe) | 331 | 306 | 269 | 1,194 | 1,035 | ||||||||||||
Natural gas equivalent realized price ($/mcfe)(b) | 5.08 | 5.78 | 5.87 | 5.70 | 6.09 | ||||||||||||
Oil and NGL (liquids) production (in mbbls) | 9,767 | 8,669 | 5,562 | 31,676 | 18,395 | ||||||||||||
Liquids as % of total production | 18 | 17 | 12 | 16 | 11 | ||||||||||||
Average realized liquids price ($/bbl)(b) | 64.12 | 63.03 | 62.62 | 63.90 | 62.71 | ||||||||||||
Liquids as % of realized revenue | 37 | 31 | 22 | 30 | 18 | ||||||||||||
Liquids as % of unhedged revenue | 47 | 40 | 34 | 40 | 25 | ||||||||||||
Natural gas production (in bcf) | 272 | 254 | 235 | 1,004 | 925 | ||||||||||||
Natural gas as % of total production | 82 | 83 | 88 | 84 | 89 | ||||||||||||
Average realized natural gas price ($/mcf)(b) | 3.87 | 4.82 | 5.22 | 4.77 | 5.57 | ||||||||||||
Natural gas as % of realized revenue | 63 | 69 | 78 | 70 | 82 | ||||||||||||
Natural gas as % of unhedged revenue | 53 | 60 | 66 | 60 | 75 | ||||||||||||
Marketing, gathering and compression net margin ($/mcfe)(c) | 0.07 | 0.10 | 0.13 | 0.10 | 0.12 | ||||||||||||
Oilfield services net margin ($/mcfe) (c) | 0.09 | 0.11 | 0.05 | 0.10 | 0.03 | ||||||||||||
Production expenses ($/mcfe) | (0.88 | ) | (0.92 | ) | (0.90 | ) | (0.90 | ) | (0.86 | ) | |||||||
Production taxes ($/mcfe) | (0.15 | ) | (0.16 | ) | (0.14 | ) | (0.16 | ) | (0.15 | ) | |||||||
General and administrative costs ($/mcfe)(d) | (0.35 | ) | (0.41 | ) | (0.34 | ) | (0.38 | ) | (0.36 | ) | |||||||
Stock-based compensation ($/mcfe) | (0.06 | ) | (0.08 | ) | (0.08 | ) | (0.08 | ) | (0.08 | ) | |||||||
DD&A of natural gas and liquids properties ($/mcfe) | (1.46 | ) | (1.38 | ) | (1.37 | ) | (1.37 | ) | (1.35 | ) | |||||||
D&A of other assets ($/mcfe) | (0.26 | ) | (0.24 | ) | (0.23 | ) | (0.24 | ) | (0.21 | ) | |||||||
Interest income (expense) ($/mcfe)(b) | (0.04 | ) | (0.01 | ) | 0.01 | (0.03 | ) | (0.08 | ) | ||||||||
Operating cash flow ($ in millions)(e) | 1,311 | 1,409 | 1,370 | 5,309 | 5,168 | ||||||||||||
Operating cash flow ($/mcfe) | 3.96 | 4.60 | 5.10 | 4.45 | 4.99 | ||||||||||||
Adjusted ebitda ($ in millions)(f) | 1,308 | 1,385 | 1,274 | 5,406 | 5,083 | ||||||||||||
Adjusted ebitda ($/mcfe) | 3.95 | 4.52 | 4.75 | 4.53 | 4.91 | ||||||||||||
Net income to common stockholders ($ in millions) | 429 | 879 | 180 | 1,570 | 1,663 | ||||||||||||
Earnings per share ? diluted ($) | 0.63 | 1.23 | 0.28 | 2.32 | 2.51 | ||||||||||||
Adjusted net income to common stockholders ($ in millions)(g) | 394 | 496 | 478 | 1,936 | 1,971 | ||||||||||||
Adjusted earnings per share ? diluted ($) | 0.58 | 0.72 | 0.70 | 2.80 | 2.95 | ||||||||||||
(a) | ? | Includes effect of the Fayetteville Shale asset sale to BHP Billiton on March 31, 2011 (which had an average production loss impact of approximately 400 mmcfe per day in both the 2011 fourth and third quarters and approximately 300 mmcfe per day for the 2011 full year) and the VPP #9 sale in May 2011 (which had an average production loss impact of approximately 70 mmcfe per day in the 2011 fourth and third quarters and approximately 45 mmcfe per day for the 2011 full year). |
(b) | Includes the effects of realized gains (losses) from hedging, but excludes the effects of unrealized gains (losses) from hedging. | |
(c) | Includes revenue and operating costs and excludes depreciation and amortization of other assets. | |
(d) | Excludes expenses associated with non-cash stock-based compensation. | |
(e) | Defined as cash flow provided by operating activities before changes in assets and liabilities. | |
(f) | Defined as net income before income taxes, interest expense, and depreciation, depletion and amortization expense, as adjusted to remove the effects of certain items detailed on pages 21. | |
(g) | Defined as net income available to common stockholders, as adjusted to remove the effects of certain items detailed on pages 22 and 23. | |
? |
2011 Full Year Average Daily Production Increases 15% over 2010 Full
Year Average Daily Production, Setting Record for 22nd
Consecutive Year; 2011 Fourth Quarter Liquids Production Increases 76%
Year over Year and Delivers 18% of Total Production and 47% of Unhedged
Natural Gas and Liquids Revenue
Chesapeake′s daily production for the 2011 fourth quarter averaged 3.596
bcfe, an increase of 8% from the average 3.329 bcfe produced per day in
the 2011 third quarter and an increase of 23% from the average 2.920
bcfe produced per day in the 2010 fourth quarter. Chesapeake′s average
daily production of 3.596 bcfe for the 2011 fourth quarter consisted of
approximately 2.959 billion cubic feet of natural gas (bcf) (82% on a
natural gas equivalent basis) and approximately 106,000 barrels (bbls)
of oil and natural gas liquids (collectively 'liquids?) (18% on a
natural gas equivalent basis). For the 2011 fourth quarter, the
company′s year-over-year growth rate of natural gas production was 16%
and its year-over-year growth rate of liquids production was 76%, or
approximately 46,000 bbls per day. The company′s percentage of revenue
from liquids in the 2011 fourth quarter was 47% of total unhedged
natural gas and liquids revenue compared to 40% in the 2011 third
quarter and 34% in the 2010 fourth quarter.
The company′s daily production for the 2011 full year averaged 3.272
bcfe, an increase of 15% over the 2.836 bcfe of average daily production
for the 2010 full year. Chesapeake′s average daily production for the
2011 full year of 3.272 bcfe consisted of 2.751 bcf (84% on a natural
gas equivalent basis) and approximately 87,000 bbls (16% on a natural
gas equivalent basis). For the 2011 full year, the company′s
year-over-year growth rate of natural gas production was 9% and its
year-over-year growth rate of liquids production was 72%, or
approximately 36,000 barrels per day. The company′s percentage of
revenue from liquids in the 2011 full year was 40% of total unhedged
natural gas and liquids revenue compared to 25% in the 2010 full year
and 20% in the 2009 full year. The 2011 full year was Chesapeake′s 22nd
consecutive year of sequential production growth.
Average Realized Prices, Hedging Results and Hedging Positions
Detailed
Average prices realized during the 2011 fourth quarter (including
realized gains or losses from natural gas and oil derivatives, but
excluding unrealized gains or losses on such derivatives) were $3.87 per
thousand cubic feet of natural gas (mcf) and $64.12 per bbl, for a
realized natural gas equivalent price of $5.08 per thousand cubic feet
of natural gas equivalent (mcfe). Realized gains from natural gas and
liquids hedging activities during the 2011 fourth quarter generated a
$1.23 gain per mcf and a $2.06 loss per bbl for a 2011 fourth quarter
realized hedging gain of $315 million, or $0.95 per mcfe.
By comparison, average prices realized during the 2010 fourth quarter
(including realized gains or losses from natural gas and oil
derivatives, but excluding unrealized gains or losses on such
derivatives) were $5.22 per mcf and $62.62 per bbl, for a realized
natural gas equivalent price of $5.87 per mcfe. Realized gains from
natural gas and liquids hedging activities during the 2010 fourth
quarter generated a $2.39 gain per mcf and a $1.43 gain per bbl for a
2010 fourth quarter realized hedging gain of $571 million, or $2.13 per
mcfe.
For the 2011 full year, average prices realized (including realized
gains or losses from natural gas and oil derivatives, but excluding
unrealized gains or losses on such derivatives) were $4.77 per mcf and
$63.90 per bbl, for a realized natural gas equivalent price of $5.70 per
mcfe. Realized gains from natural gas and liquids hedging activities
during the 2011 full year generated a $1.65 gain per mcf and a $3.21
loss per bbl for a 2011 full year realized hedging gain of $1.554
billion, or $1.30 per mcfe.
By comparison, average prices realized during the 2010 full year
(including realized gains or losses from natural gas and oil
derivatives, but excluding unrealized gains or losses on such
derivatives) were $5.57 per mcf and $62.71 per bbl, for a realized
natural gas equivalent price of $6.09 per mcfe. Realized gains from
natural gas and liquids hedging activities during the 2010 full year
generated a $2.14 gain per mcf and a $4.04 gain per bbl for a 2010 full
year realized hedging gain of $2.056 billion, or $1.99 per mcfe.
The company′s realized cash hedging gains since January 1, 2006 have
been $8.404 billion, or $1.59 per mcfe.
Company Provides Update on Hedging Positions
The following table summarizes Chesapeake′s 2012 and 2013 open swap
positions as of February 21, 2012. Depending on changes in natural gas
and oil futures markets and management′s view of underlying natural gas
and liquids supply and demand trends, Chesapeake may increase or
decrease some or all of its hedging positions at any time in the future
without notice.
? | ? | ? | Natural Gas | ? | ? | Liquids | |||||||||
| Year | ? | % of Forecasted | ? | $ NYMEX | % of Forecasted | ? | $ NYMEX | ||||||||
2012 | ? | 0 | % | ? | ? | 43 | % | $ | 102.48 | ||||||
2013 | ? | 0 | % | ? | ? | 5 | % | $ | 102.59 | ||||||
In addition to the open hedging positions disclosed above, as of
February 21, 2012, the company had an additional $184 million and $47
million of net hedging gains on closed contracts and premiums for call
options that will be realized in 2012 and 2013, respectively, as set
forth below.
? | ? | ? | Natural Gas | ? | ? | Liquids | |||||||||||||||
| Year | ? | Forecasted | ? | Gains/Premiums | ? | ($/mcf) | Forecasted | ? | Gains (Losses)/ | ? | ($/bbl) | ||||||||||
2012 | ? | 970 | $ | 400 | $ | 0.41 | 55,000 | $ | (216 | ) | $ | (3.93 | ) | ||||||||
2013 | ? | 1,040 | $ | 21 | $ | 0.02 | 76,000 | $ | 26 | ? | $ | 0.35 | ? | ||||||||
Details of the company′s year-end hedging positions will be included in
the company′s 2011 Form 10-K to be filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (SEC) and current positions are disclosed in summary
format in the company′s Outlook dated February 21, 2012 for 2012 and
2013, which is attached to this release as Schedule 'A,? beginning on
page 24. The Outlook has been changed from the Outlook dated November 3,
2011, attached as Schedule 'B,? which begins on page 28, to reflect
various updated information.
Proved Natural Gas and Oil Reserves Increase by 1.7 Tcfe, or 10% for
the 2011 Full Year to 18.8 Tcfe Despite the Sale of 2.8 Tcfe of Proved
Reserves; Proved Reserves on a Boe Basis Now Reach 3.1 Billion Boe;
Company Adds Proved Reserves of 5.6 Tcfe through the Drillbit in 2011 at
a Drilling and Completion Cost of $1.08 per Mcfe
The following table compares Chesapeake′s December 31, 2011 proved
reserves, the increase over its year-end 2010 proved reserves, reserve
replacement ratio, estimated future net cash flows from proved reserves
(discounted at an annual rate of 10% before income taxes (PV-10)) and
proved developed percentage based on the trailing 12-month average price
required under SEC rules and the 10-year average NYMEX strip prices as
of December 31, 2011.
| Pricing Method | ? | ? | Natural Gas Price ($/mcf) | ? | ? |
Oil Price ($/bbl) | ? | ? | Proved Reserves (tcfe)(a) | ? | ? | Proved Reserves Growth (tcfe)(b) | ? | ? | Proved Reserves Growth %(b) | ? | ? | Reserve Replacement Ratio | ? | ? | PV-10 (billions) | ? | ? | Proved Developed Percentage | ||||||
Trailing 12-month average (SEC)(c) | ? | ? | $ | 4.12 | ? | ? | $ | 95.97 | ? | ? | 18.8 | ? | ? | 1.7 | ? | ? | 10 | % | ? | ? | 242 | % | ? | ? | $ | 19.9 | ? | ? | 54 | % |
12/31/11 10-year average NYMEX strip(d) | $ | 4.92 | $ | 92.61 | 19.9 | 2.3 | 13 | % | 291 | % | $ | 23.8 | 53 | % | ||||||||||||||||
(a) | ? | After sales of proved reserves of approximately 2.8 tcfe during 2011. |
(b) | Compares proved reserves and growth for 2011 under comparable pricing methods. At year-end 2010, Chesapeake′s proved reserves were 17.1 tcfe using trailing 12-month average prices, which are required by SEC reporting rules, and 17.6 tcfe using the 10-year average NYMEX strip prices as of December 31, 2010. | |
(c) | Reserve volumes estimated using SEC reserve recognition standards and pricing assumptions based on the trailing 12-month average first-day-of-the-month prices as of December 31, 2011. This pricing yields estimated 'proved reserves' for SEC reporting purposes. Natural gas and oil volumes estimated under the 10-year average NYMEX strip reflect an alternative pricing scenario that illustrates the sensitivity of proved reserves to a different pricing assumption. | |
(d) | Futures prices represent an unbiased consensus estimate by market participants about the likely prices to be received for future production. Management believes that 10-year average NYMEX strip prices provide a better indicator of the likely economic producibility of the company′s proved reserves than the historical 12-month average price. | |
? |
The following table summarizes Chesapeake′s proved well costs for the
2011 full year using the two pricing methods described above.
? | ? | ? | Trailing 12-Month Average (SEC) Pricing ($/mcfe) | ? | ? | 12/31/11 10-year Average NYMEX Strip Pricing ($/mcfe) | ||
Proved well costs (a) | ? | ? | $ | 1.08 | ? | ? | $ | 0.99 |
(a) | ? | Includes performance-related reserve revisions and excludes price-related revisions. Costs are net of $2.570 billion of well cost carries paid by the company′s joint venture partners. |
? |
A complete reconciliation of proved reserves and reserve replacement
ratios based on these two alternative pricing methods, along with total
costs, is presented on pages 14 and 15 of this release. Also, a
reconciliation of PV-10 to the standardized measure is presented on page
16 of this release.
Additionally, the net book value of the company′s other assets was $7.5
billion as of December 31, 2011, compared to $6.1 billion as of December
31, 2010.
Chesapeake′s Leasehold and 3-D Seismic Inventories Total 15.3 Million
Net Acres and 30.8 Million Acres, Respectively; Risked Unproved
Resources in the Company′s Inventory Total 114 Tcfe; Unrisked Unproved
Resources Total 352 Tcfe
Since 2000, Chesapeake has built the largest combined inventories of
onshore leasehold (15.3 million net acres) and 3-D seismic (30.8 million
acres) in the U.S. The company has also accumulated the largest
inventory of U.S. natural gas shale play leasehold (2.2 million net
acres) and now owns a leading position in 11 of what Chesapeake believes
are the Top 15 unconventional liquids-rich plays in the U.S. ? the
Granite Wash, Cleveland, Tonkawa and Mississippi Lime plays in the
Anadarko Basin; the Avalon, Bone Spring, Wolfcamp and Wolfberry plays in
the Permian Basin; the Eagle Ford Shale in South Texas; the Niobrara
Shale in the Powder River Basin; and the Utica Shale in the Appalachian
Basin.
On its leasehold inventory, Chesapeake has identified an estimated 19.9
tcfe of proved reserves (using volume estimates based on the 10-year
average NYMEX strip prices as of December 31, 2011 as compared to 18.8
tcfe using SEC pricing), 114 tcfe of risked unproved resources and 352
tcfe of unrisked unproved resources. The company is currently using 161
operated drilling rigs to further develop its inventory of approximately
39,200 net risked drillsites. Of Chesapeake′s 161 operated rigs, 125 are
drilling wells primarily focused on developing unconventional
liquids-rich plays, 34 are drilling wells primarily focused on
unconventional natural gas plays and two are drilling conventional
natural gas plays. By April 1, 2012, the company estimates it will be
using 157 operated rigs, of which 131 will be drilling wells primarily
focused on developing unconventional liquids-rich plays, while only 26
will be drilling wells primarily focused on unconventional natural gas
plays and no rigs will be drilling conventional natural gas plays ? the
first time in the company′s nearly 23-year history it has not been
drilling a conventional natural gas well.
The following table summarizes Chesapeake′s ownership and activity in
its unconventional natural gas plays, its unconventional liquids-rich
plays and other plays. Chesapeake uses a probability-weighted
statistical approach to estimate the potential number of drillsites and
unproved resources associated with such drillsites.
? | ? | ? | ? | Risked | ? | ? | Total | ? | ? | Risked | ? | ? | Unrisked | ? | ? | 4Q2011 Avg | ? | ? | Feb 2012 | ||
| CHK | Net | Proved | Unproved | Unproved | Daily Net | Operated | |||||||||||||||
| Net | Undrilled | Reserves | Resources | Resources | Production | Rig | |||||||||||||||
| Play Type | ? | ? | Acreage(a) | ? | ? | Wells | ? | ? | (bcfe)(a)(b) | ? | ? | (bcfe)(a) | ? | ? | (bcfe)(a) | ? | ? | (mmcfe) | ? | ? | Count |
? | |||||||||||||||||||||
Unconventional Natural Gas Plays | 2,180,000 | 13,400 | 10,340 | 56,700 | 129,500 | 2,027 | 34 | ||||||||||||||
? | |||||||||||||||||||||
Unconventional Liquids Plays | 6,595,000 | 16,150 | 4,982 | 49,500 | 187,000 | 981 | 125 | ||||||||||||||
? | |||||||||||||||||||||
Other Plays | 6,505,000 | 9,650 | 4,565 | 7,300 | 35,200 | 588 | 2 | ||||||||||||||
? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? |
| Totals | ? | ? | 15,280,000 | ? | ? | 39,200 | ? | ? | 19,887 | ? | ? | 113,500 | ? | ? | 351,700 | ? | ? | 3,596 | ? | ? | 161 |
(a) | ? | As of December 31, 2011, pro forma for recent leasehold transactions. |
(b) | Based on 10-year average NYMEX strip prices at December 31, 2011. | |
? |
In recognition of the value gap between liquids and natural gas prices,
Chesapeake has directed a significant portion of its technological and
leasehold acquisition expertise during the past three years to identify,
secure and commercialize new unconventional liquids-rich plays. To date,
Chesapeake has built leasehold positions and established production in
multiple unconventional liquids-rich plays on approximately 6.6 million
net leasehold acres with 830 million bbls of oil equivalent of proved
reserves, 8.3 billion bbls of oil equivalent (bboe) (or 50 tcfe) of
risked unproved resources and 31 bboe (or 187 tcfe) of unrisked unproved
resources based on the company′s internal estimates.
Curtailments of Natural Gas Reach Approximately 1.0 Bcf per Day of
Gross Operated Production
In response to continued low natural gas prices and as an effort to help
bring U.S. natural gas supply and demand into better balance, Chesapeake
has demonstrated industry leadership by curtailing natural gas
production to the upper level indicated in the company′s announcement on
January 23, 2012. The company has now curtailed approximately 1.0 bcf
per day of gross operated natural gas production, or approximately 1.5%
of U.S. Lower 48 natural gas production. The curtailed volumes are
located primarily in the Haynesville and Barnett shale plays. In
addition, wherever possible, the company is deferring completions of dry
gas wells that have been drilled, but not yet completed, and is also
deferring pipeline connections of dry gas wells that have already been
completed.
Company is Reducing 2012 Operated Drilling Capital Expenditures in
Dry Gas Plays by Approximately 70% from 2011 Levels, Lowest Level Since
2005; 2012 Average Net Natural Gas Production Projected to Decrease 4%
Year Over Year
The company continues to substantially reduce its operated dry gas
drilling activity. By the 2012 second quarter, the company expects that
its dry gas rig count will be reduced from an average of approximately
75 dry gas rigs used during 2011 to approximately 24 rigs, including 12
rigs in the northeastern portion of the Marcellus Shale, six rigs in the
Haynesville Shale and six rigs in the Barnett Shale. Chesapeake′s
operated dry gas drilling capital expenditures in 2012, net of drilling
carries, are expected to decrease to $0.9 billion, a decrease of
approximately 70% from similar expenditures of $3.1 billion in 2011 and
the company′s lowest expenditures on dry gas plays since 2005.
As a result of production curtailments and reduced drilling and
completion activity, partially offset by growth in associated natural
gas production in liquids-rich plays, Chesapeake projects that its 2012
net natural gas production will average approximately 2.65 bcf per day,
a decrease of 100 mmcf per day, or 4%, compared to the company′s 2011
average net natural gas production of 2.75 bcf per day.
Chesapeake to Double 2012 Operated Drilling Capital Expenditures in
Liquids-Rich Plays; 2012 Average Net Liquids Production Projected to
Increase More than 70% Year Over Year to Approximately 150,000 Barrels
per Day
Chesapeake has reallocated capital from reduced dry gas drilling and
deferred well completion and pipeline connection activities to its
liquids-rich plays that offer superior returns in the current strong
liquids price environment. This reallocation will result in a doubling
of operated drilling capital expenditures compared to 2011 activities in
Chesapeake′s liquids-rich plays, which include the Eagle Ford Shale,
Utica Shale, Mississippi Lime, Granite Wash, Cleveland, Tonkawa,
Niobrara, Bone Spring, Avalon, Wolfcamp, and Wolfberry. Chesapeake is
increasing its operated drilling activity in liquids-rich plays by
approximately 45% from an average of approximately 92 rigs used in
liquids-rich plays during 2011 to an average of approximately 133 rigs
in 2012. The company estimates that approximately 85% of its 2012 total
net operated drilling capital expenditures will be invested in its
liquids-rich plays.
As a result of continued strong operational results and increased
drilling activity in liquids-rich plays, Chesapeake has increased its
current liquids production to more than 110,000 bbls per day. The
company projects that its 2012 net liquids production will increase by
approximately 63,000 bbls per day, or more than 70% year over year, to
an average of approximately 150,000 bbls per day. Additionally,
Chesapeake projects that its liquids production will average more than
200,000 bbls per day in 2013 and 250,000 bbls per day in 2015. Relative
to its liquids production rate of approximately 32,000 bbls per day in
2009, Chesapeake believes that its liquids production growth of
approximately 220,000 bbls per day from 2009-2015 will represent the
best track record of liquids production growth in the U.S. and one of
the best track records of liquids production growth in the world during
this period.
Chesapeake′s projected drilling activity and production in liquids-rich
plays discussed above excludes the potential effects of planned 2012
asset monetization transactions associated with the company′s
Mississippi Lime and Permian Basin assets discussed below.
As Previously Disclosed, Chesapeake Plans to Reduce 2012 Net
Leasehold Expenditures by Approximately 60% Year Over Year
Having captured the largest U.S. oil and natural gas resource base
during the past six years of new unconventional play identification and
opportunity capture, Chesapeake is reducing its undeveloped leasehold
expenditures. The company is now targeting to invest approximately $1.4
billion in net undeveloped leasehold expenditures in 2012, of which
approximately 90% will target liquids-rich plays and 100% will be in
plays where the company is already active. This compares to net
undeveloped leasehold expenditures of approximately $3.5 billion and
$5.8 billion in 2011 and 2010, respectively.
Company Provides Details on its Financial Plan for 2012
Chesapeake′s primary business goal is to continue creating at least $10
billion of shareholder net asset value each year through a strategy
dedicated to growing its reserves and production and transitioning to a
more balanced mix of liquids and natural gas production. As a result of
this strategy, the company plans to make capital expenditures in 2012
and 2013 that will exceed its projected cash flow from operations. As
previously disclosed in its press release dated February 13, 2012,
Chesapeake is pursuing a financial plan to fully fund its anticipated
capital expenditures during 2012 and provide additional liquidity for
2013. Furthermore, the company is also projecting that its rapidly
increasing liquids production will enable it in 2014 to reach
equilibrium between its cash flow from operations and its planned
drilling and completion capital expenditures.
Chesapeake anticipates receiving total proceeds in March 2012 of
approximately $2 billion in two separate transactions ? a volumetric
production payment on its Texas Panhandle Granite Wash assets and a
financial transaction (similar to the company′s recent CHK Utica
financial transaction) involving a new unrestricted subsidiary formed to
hold a portion of Chesapeake′s assets in Ellis and Roger Mills counties,
Oklahoma, in the Cleveland and Tonkawa plays.
In addition, the company is pursuing joint venture transactions in its
Mississippi Lime and Permian Basin plays where it owns 1.8 million and
1.5 million net acres of leasehold, respectively. Chesapeake has also
recently received industry inquiries about a complete exit from the
Permian Basin and may consider a 100% sale of its Permian Basin assets
if it receives a compelling offer. Chesapeake′s position in the Permian
Basin is one of the largest in the basin, with leading positions in the
Bone Spring, Avalon, Wolfcamp and Wolfberry plays. Chesapeake′s assets
in the Permian Basin represent approximately 5% of the company′s total
net proved reserves and current production. Chesapeake believes the
Mississippi Lime joint venture, a Permian Basin transaction and various
other minor asset sales could result in cash proceeds to Chesapeake of
approximately $6-8 billion in 2012. The company is targeting completion
of these transactions by the end of the 2012 third quarter.
Furthermore, Chesapeake anticipates monetization proceeds of
approximately $2 billion during 2012 involving a portion of its
midstream assets, oilfield services assets and miscellaneous
investments, bringing estimated total monetization cash proceeds in 2012
to $10-12 billion. These proceeds are substantially in excess of the
difference between the company′s expected cash flow from operations and
its planned capital expenditures and would allow the company to achieve
its previously announced debt reduction goals while providing additional
financial strength during this current period of low U.S. natural gas
prices.
Company Returns to its Original 25/25 Plan
As a result of reducing its projected natural gas production through
production curtailments and reduced natural gas drilling, Chesapeake is
returning to its original 25/25 Plan announced in January 2011 that
outlined the company′s plan to increase its production and reduce its
total long-term debt by 25% each during 2011-12. During 2011, the
company achieved 60% of its two-year production growth goal and 72% of
its two-year long-term debt reduction goal. The company projects 2012
average daily production of 3.550 bcfe per day, a 25% increase from its
2010 average daily production of 2.836 bcfe per day. Chesapeake
continues to affirm its plan to reduce its long-term debt to no more
than $9.5 billion at December 31, 2012 and achieving its 25/25 Plan
objectives regardless of the level of natural gas prices during 2012.
2011 Fourth Quarter and Full Year Financial and Operational Results
Conference
Call Information
A conference call to discuss this release has been scheduled for
Wednesday, February 22, 2012 at 9:00 am EST. The telephone number to
access the conference call is 913-312-0684 or toll-free 800-289-0546.
The passcode for the call is 4996325. We encourage those who
would like to participate in the call to place calls between 8:50 and
9:00 am EST. For those unable to participate in the conference call, a
replay will be available for audio playback at 1:00 pm EST on Wednesday,
February 22, 2012 and will run through midnight Wednesday, March 7,
2012. The number to access the conference call replay is 719-457-0820 or
toll-free 888-203-1112. The passcode for the replay is 4996325.
The conference call will also be webcast live on Chesapeake′s website at www.chk.com
in the 'Events? subsection of the 'Investors? section of the website.
The webcast of the conference call will be available on Chesapeake′s
website for one year.
This news release and the accompanying Outlooks include
'forward-looking statements? within the meaning of Section ?27A of the
Securities Act of 1933 and Section ?21E of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934.Forward-looking statements are statements other than
statements of historical fact and give our current expectations or
forecasts of future events.They include estimates of natural gas
and oil reserves and resources, expected natural gas and oil production
and future expenses, assumptions regarding future natural gas and oil
prices, planned drilling activity, drilling and completion costs and
anticipated asset sales, projected cash flow and liquidity, business
strategy and other plans and objectives for future operations.Disclosures
concerning the fair value of derivative contracts and their estimated
contribution to our future results of operations are based upon market
information as of a specific date.These market prices are
subject to significant volatility.We caution you not to place
undue reliance on our forward-looking statements, which speak only as of
the date of this news release, and we undertake no obligation to update
this information.
Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from
expected results are described under 'Risks Related to Our Business? in
our Prospectus Supplement filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange
Commission on February ?14, 2012.These risk factors include
the volatility of natural gas and oil prices; the limitations our level
of indebtedness may have on our financial flexibility; declines in the
values of our natural gas and oil properties resulting in ceiling test
write-downs; the availability of capital on an economic basis, including
through planned asset monetization transactions, to fund reserve
replacement costs; our ability to replace reserves and sustain
production; uncertainties inherent in estimating quantities of natural
gas and oil reserves and projecting future rates of production and the
amount and timing of development expenditures; inability to generate
profits or achieve targeted results in drilling and well operations;
leasehold terms expiring before production can be established; hedging
activities resulting in lower prices realized on natural gas and oil
sales; the need to secure hedging liabilities and the inability of
hedging counterparties to satisfy their obligations; drilling and
operating risks, including potential environmental liabilities;
legislative and regulatory changes adversely affecting our industry and
our business, including initiatives related to hydraulic fracturing;
general economic conditions negatively impacting us and our business
counterparties; oilfield services shortages and transportation capacity
constraints and interruptions that could adversely affect our cash flow;
and losses possible from pending or future litigation.
Our production forecasts are dependent upon many assumptions,
including estimates of production decline rates from existing wells and
the outcome of future drilling activity.Although we believe the
expectations and forecasts reflected in these and other forward-looking
statements are reasonable, we can give no assurance they will prove to
have been correct.They can be affected by inaccurate assumptions
or by known or unknown risks and uncertainties.
The SEC requires natural gas and oil companies, in filings made with
the SEC, to disclose proved reserves, which are those quantities of
natural gas and oil that by analysis of geoscience and engineering data
can be estimated with reasonable certainty to be economically
producible?from a given date forward, from known reservoirs, and under
existing economic conditions, operating methods, and government
regulations?prior to the time at which contracts providing the right to
operate expire, unless evidence indicates that renewal is reasonably
certain, regardless of whether deterministic or probabilistic methods
are used for the estimation.In this news release, we use the
terms 'risked and unrisked unproved resources? to describe Chesapeake′s
internal estimates of volumes of natural gas and oil that are not
classified as proved reserves but are potentially recoverable through
exploratory drilling or additional drilling or recovery techniques.These
are broader descriptions of potentially recoverable volumes than
probable and possible reserves, as defined by SEC regulations.Estimates
of unproved resources are by their nature more speculative than
estimates of proved reserves and accordingly are subject to
substantially greater risk of actually being realized by the company.We believe our estimates of unproved resources are reasonable, but
such estimates have not been reviewed by independent engineers.Estimates
of unproved resources may change significantly as development provides
additional data, and actual quantities that are ultimately recovered may
differ substantially from prior estimates.
Chesapeake Energy Corporation (NYSE:CHK) is the second-largest
producer of natural gas, a Top 15 producer of oil and natural gas
liquids and the most active driller of new wells in the U.S.Headquartered
in Oklahoma City, the company's operations are focused on discovering
and developing unconventional natural gas and oil fields onshore in the
U.S.Chesapeake owns leading positions in the Barnett,
Haynesville, Bossier, Marcellus and Pearsall natural gas shale plays and
in the Granite Wash, Cleveland, Tonkawa, Mississippi Lime, Bone Spring,
Avalon, Wolfcamp, Wolfberry, Eagle Ford, Niobrara and Utica
unconventional liquids-rich plays.The company has also
vertically integrated its operations and owns substantial midstream,
compression, drilling, trucking, pressure pumping and other oilfield
service assets directly and indirectly through its subsidiaries
Chesapeake Midstream Development, L.P. and Chesapeake Oilfield Services,
L.L.C. and its affiliate Chesapeake Midstream Partners, L.P. (NYSE:CHKM).Further information is available at www.chk.com
where Chesapeake routinely posts announcements, updates, events,
investor information, presentations and news releases.
? | ||||||||||||||||
? | ||||||||||||||||
| CHESAPEAKE ENERGY CORPORATION | ||||||||||||||||
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS | ||||||||||||||||
| ($ in millions, except per-share and unit data) | ||||||||||||||||
| (unaudited) | ||||||||||||||||
? | ||||||||||||||||
| THREE MONTHS ENDED: | ? | ? | December 31, | ? | ? | December 31, | ||||||||||
? | ? | 2011 | ? | ? | 2010 | |||||||||||
? | $ | ? | ? | $/mcfe | ? | $ | ? | ? | $/mcfe | |||||||
| REVENUES: | ||||||||||||||||
| Natural gas and liquids | 1,336 | 4.03 | 949 | 3.53 | ||||||||||||
| Marketing, gathering and compression | 1,246 | 3.77 | 959 | 3.57 | ||||||||||||
| Oilfield services | ? | 145 | ? | 0.44 | ? | ? | 67 | ? | 0.25 | ? | ||||||
| Total Revenues | ? | 2,727 | ? | 8.24 | ? | ? | 1,975 | ? | 7.35 | ? | ||||||
? | ||||||||||||||||
| OPERATING EXPENSES: | ||||||||||||||||
| Natural gas and oil production | 292 | 0.88 | 241 | 0.90 | ||||||||||||
| Production taxes | 51 | 0.15 | 38 | 0.14 | ||||||||||||
| Marketing, gathering and compression | 1,223 | 3.70 | 923 | 3.44 | ||||||||||||
| Oilfield services | 115 | 0.35 | 55 | 0.20 | ||||||||||||
| General and administrative | 138 | 0.42 | 114 | 0.42 | ||||||||||||
Natural gas and liquids depreciation, depletion and amortization | 484 | 1.46 | 368 | 1.37 | ||||||||||||
| Depreciation and amortization of other assets | 85 | 0.26 | 61 | 0.23 | ||||||||||||
| (Gains) losses on sales and impairments of fixed assets | ? | (397 | ) | (1.20 | ) | ? | (153 | ) | (0.57 | ) | ||||||
| Total Operating Expenses | ? | 1,991 | ? | 6.02 | ? | ? | 1,647 | ? | 6.13 | ? | ||||||
? | ||||||||||||||||
| INCOME FROM OPERATIONS | ? | 736 | ? | 2.22 | ? | ? | 328 | ? | 1.22 | ? | ||||||
? | ||||||||||||||||
| OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE): | ||||||||||||||||
| Interest expense | (7 | ) | (0.02 | ) | (7 | ) | (0.03 | ) | ||||||||
| Earnings on investments | 56 | 0.17 | 37 | 0.14 | ||||||||||||
| Other income | ? | 14 | ? | 0.04 | ? | ? | 5 | ? | 0.02 | ? | ||||||
| Total Other Income | ? | 63 | ? | 0.19 | ? | ? | 35 | ? | 0.13 | ? | ||||||
? | ||||||||||||||||
| INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES | 799 | 2.41 | 363 | 1.35 | ||||||||||||
? | ||||||||||||||||
| INCOME TAX EXPENSE (BENEFIT): | ||||||||||||||||
| Current income taxes | 2 | ? | (4 | ) | (0.02 | ) | ||||||||||
| Deferred income taxes | ? | 310 | ? | 0.94 | ? | ? | 144 | ? | 0.54 | ? | ||||||
| Total Income Tax Expense | ? | 312 | ? | 0.94 | ? | ? | 140 | ? | 0.52 | ? | ||||||
? | ||||||||||||||||
| NET INCOME | 487 | 1.47 | 223 | 0.83 | ||||||||||||
? | ||||||||||||||||
| Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests | ? | (15 | ) | (0.04 | ) | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ||||||
? | ||||||||||||||||
| NET INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO CHESAPEAKE | ? | 472 | ? | 1.43 | ? | ? | 223 | ? | 0.83 | ? | ||||||
? | ||||||||||||||||
| Preferred stock dividends | ? | (43 | ) | (0.13 | ) | ? | (43 | ) | (0.16 | ) | ||||||
? | ||||||||||||||||
| NET INCOME AVAILABLE TO COMMON STOCKHOLDERS | ? | 429 | ? | 1.30 | ? | ? | 180 | ? | 0.67 | ? | ||||||
? | ||||||||||||||||
| EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE: | ||||||||||||||||
| Basic | $ | 0.67 | ? | $ | 0.29 | ? | ||||||||||
| Diluted | $ | 0.63 | ? | $ | 0.28 | ? | ||||||||||
? | ||||||||||||||||
| WEIGHTED AVERAGE COMMON AND COMMON | ||||||||||||||||
| EQUIVALENT SHARES OUTSTANDING (in millions): | ||||||||||||||||
| Basic | ? | 640 | ? | ? | 632 | ? | ||||||||||
| Diluted | ? | 750 | ? | ? | 639 | ? | ||||||||||
? | ||||||||||||||||
? | ||||||||||||||||
| CHESAPEAKE ENERGY CORPORATION | ||||||||||||||||
| CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS | ||||||||||||||||
| ($ in millions, except per-share and unit data) | ||||||||||||||||
| (unaudited) | ||||||||||||||||
? | ||||||||||||||||
| TWELVE MONTHS ENDED: | ? | ? | December 31, | ? | ? | December 31, | ||||||||||
? | ? | 2011 | ? | ? | 2010 | |||||||||||
? | $ | ? | ? | $/mcfe | ? | $ | ? | ? | $/mcfe | |||||||
| REVENUES: | ||||||||||||||||
| Natural gas and liquids | 6,024 | 5.04 | 5,647 | 5.46 | ||||||||||||
| Marketing, gathering and compression | 5,090 | 4.26 | 3,479 | 3.36 | ||||||||||||
| Oilfield services | ? | 521 | ? | 0.44 | ? | ? | 240 | ? | 0.23 | ? | ||||||
| Total Revenues | ? | 11,635 | ? | 9.74 | ? | ? | 9,366 | ? | 9.05 | ? | ||||||
? | ||||||||||||||||
| OPERATING EXPENSES: | ||||||||||||||||
| Natural gas and oil production | 1,073 | 0.90 | 893 | 0.86 | ||||||||||||
| Production taxes | 192 | 0.16 | 157 | 0.15 | ||||||||||||
| Marketing, gathering and compression | 4,967 | 4.16 | 3,352 | 3.24 | ||||||||||||
| Oilfield services | 402 | 0.34 | 208 | 0.20 | ||||||||||||
| General and administrative | 548 | 0.46 | 453 | 0.44 | ||||||||||||
Natural gas and liquids depreciation, depletion and amortization | 1,632 | 1.37 | 1,394 | 1.35 | ||||||||||||
| Depreciation and amortization of other assets | 291 | 0.24 | 220 | 0.21 | ||||||||||||
| (Gains) losses on sales and impairments of fixed assets | ? | (391 | ) | (0.34 | ) | ? | (116 | ) | (0.11 | ) | ||||||
| Total Operating Expenses | ? | 8,714 | ? | 7.29 | ? | ? | 6,561 | ? | 6.34 | ? | ||||||
? | ||||||||||||||||
| INCOME FROM OPERATIONS | ? | 2,921 | ? | 2.45 | ? | ? | 2,805 | ? | 2.71 | ? | ||||||
? | ||||||||||||||||
| OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE): | ||||||||||||||||
| Interest expense | (44 | ) | (0.04 | ) | (19 | ) | (0.02 | ) | ||||||||
| Earnings on investments | 156 | 0.13 | 227 | 0.22 | ||||||||||||
| Losses on purchases or exchanges of debt | (176 | ) | (0.15 | ) | (129 | ) | (0.12 | ) | ||||||||
| Impairment of investments | ? | ? | (16 | ) | (0.02 | ) | ||||||||||
| Other income | ? | 23 | ? | 0.02 | ? | ? | 16 | ? | 0.02 | ? | ||||||
| Total Other Income (Expense) | ? | (41 | ) | (0.04 | ) | ? | 79 | ? | 0.08 | ? | ||||||
? | ||||||||||||||||
| INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES | 2,880 | 2.41 | 2,884 | 2.79 | ||||||||||||
? | ||||||||||||||||
| INCOME TAX EXPENSE: | ||||||||||||||||
| Current income taxes | 13 | 0.01 | ? | ? | ||||||||||||
| Deferred income taxes | ? | 1,110 | ? | 0.93 | ? | ? | 1,110 | ? | 1.07 | ? | ||||||
| Total Income Tax Expense | ? | 1,123 | ? | 0.94 | ? | ? | 1,110 | ? | 1.07 | ? | ||||||
? | ||||||||||||||||
| NET INCOME | 1,757 | 1.47 | 1,774 | 1.72 | ||||||||||||
? | ||||||||||||||||
| Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests | ? | (15 | ) | (0.01 | ) | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ||||||
? | ||||||||||||||||
| NET INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO CHESAPEAKE | ? | 1,742 | ? | 1.46 | ? | ? | 1,774 | ? | 1.72 | ? | ||||||
? | ||||||||||||||||
| Preferred stock dividends | ? | (172 | ) | (0.15 | ) | ? | (111 | ) | (0.11 | ) | ||||||
? | ||||||||||||||||
| NET INCOME AVAILABLE TO COMMON STOCKHOLDERS | ? | 1,570 | ? | 1.31 | ? | ? | 1,663 | ? | 1.61 | ? | ||||||
? | ||||||||||||||||
| EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE: | ||||||||||||||||
| Basic | $ | 2.47 | ? | $ | 2.63 | ? | ||||||||||
| Diluted | $ | 2.32 | ? | $ | 2.51 | ? | ||||||||||
? | ||||||||||||||||
| WEIGHTED AVERAGE COMMON AND COMMON | ||||||||||||||||
| EQUIVALENT SHARES OUTSTANDING (in millions): | ||||||||||||||||
| Basic | ? | 637 | ? | ? | 631 | ? | ||||||||||
| Diluted | ? | 752 | ? | ? | 706 | ? | ||||||||||
? | |||||||
? | |||||||
| CHESAPEAKE ENERGY CORPORATION | |||||||
| CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS | |||||||
| ($ in millions) | |||||||
| (unaudited) | |||||||
? | |||||||
? | ? | December 31, | ? | December 31, | |||
? | ? | ? | 2011 | ? | 2010 | ||
? | |||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 351 | $ | 102 | |||
| Other current assets | ? | 2,826 | ? | 3,164 | |||
| Total Current Assets | ? | 3,177 | ? | 3,266 | |||
? | |||||||
| Property and equipment (net) | 36,739 | 32,378 | |||||
| Other assets | ? | 1,919 | ? | 1,535 | |||
| Total Assets | $ | 41,835 | $ | 37,179 | |||
? | |||||||
| Current liabilities | $ | 7,082 | $ | 4,490 | |||
| Long-term debt, net of discounts | 10,626 | 12,640 | |||||
| Other long-term liabilities | 2,682 | 2,401 | |||||
| Deferred tax liability | ? | 3,484 | ? | 2,384 | |||
| Total Liabilities | ? | 23,874 | ? | 21,915 | |||
? | |||||||
| Chesapeake stockholders′ equity | 16,624 | 15,264 | |||||
| Noncontrolling interests | ? | 1,337 | ? | ? | |||
| Total Equity | ? | 17,961 | ? | 15,264 | |||
? | |||||||
| Total Liabilities and Equity | $ | 41,835 | $ | 37,179 | |||
? | |||||||
| Common Shares Outstanding (in millions) | ? | 659 | ? | 654 | |||
? | |||||||||
? | |||||||||
| CHESAPEAKE ENERGY CORPORATION | |||||||||
| CAPITALIZATION | |||||||||
| ($ in millions) | |||||||||
| (unaudited) | |||||||||
? | |||||||||
? | ? | December 31, | ? | December 31, | |||||
? | ? | ? | ? | 2011 | ? | ? | ? | 2010 | ? |
? | |||||||||
| Total debt, net of unrestricted cash | $ | 10,275 | $ | 12,538 | |||||
| Chesapeake stockholders' equity | 16,624 | 15,264 | |||||||
| Noncontrolling interests(a) | ? | 1,337 | ? | ? | ? | ? | |||
| Total | $ | 28,236 | ? | $ | 27,802 | ? | |||
? | |||||||||
| Debt to capitalization ratio(b) | 38 | % | 45 | % | |||||
(a) | ? | Includes $380 million in connection with third-party ownership in the Chesapeake Granite Wash Trust and $950 million in connection with third-party ownership of the preferred shares of CHK Utica, L.L.C. |
(b) | Represents total net debt as a percentage of total book capitalization excluding equity of noncontrolling interests. |
? | |||||||||||
? | |||||||||||
| CHESAPEAKE ENERGY CORPORATION | |||||||||||
| RECONCILIATION OF 2011 ADDITIONS TO NATURAL GAS AND OIL PROPERTIES | |||||||||||
| BASED ON SEC PRICING OF TRAILING 12-MONTH AVERAGE PRICES AT DECEMBER 31, 2011 | |||||||||||
| ($ in millions, except per-unit data) | |||||||||||
| (unaudited) | |||||||||||
? | |||||||||||
? | ? | ? | Proved Reserves | ||||||||
? | ? | Cost | ? | Bcfe(a) | ? | $/Mcfe | |||||
| PROVED PROPERTIES: | |||||||||||
| Well costs on proved properties(b) | $ | 6,080 |
| (c) | 1.08 | ||||||
| Acquisition of proved properties | 48 | 30 | 1.61 | ||||||||
| Sale of proved properties | ? | (2,612 | ) | (2,776 | ) | 0.94 | |||||
| Total net proved properties | ? | 3,516 | ? | 2,873 | ? | 1.22 | |||||
? | |||||||||||
| Revisions ? price | ? | 14 | ? | ||||||||
? | |||||||||||
| UNPROVED PROPERTIES: | |||||||||||
| Well costs on unproved properties | 1,465 | ? | ? | ||||||||
| Acquisition of unproved properties, net | 3,516 | ? | ? | ||||||||
| Sale of unproved properties | ? | (4,432 | ) | ? | ? | ? | |||||
| Total net unproved properties | ? | 549 | ? | ? | ? | ? | |||||
? | |||||||||||
| OTHER: | |||||||||||
| Capitalized interest on unproved properties | 727 | ? | ? | ||||||||
| Geological and geophysical costs | 192 | ? | ? | ||||||||
| Asset retirement obligations | ? | 3 | ? | ? | ? | ? | |||||
| Total other | ? | 922 | ? | ? | ? | ? | |||||
? | |||||||||||
| Total | $ | 4,987 | ? | 2,887 | ? | 1.73 | |||||
? | |||||
? | |||||
| CHESAPEAKE ENERGY CORPORATION | |||||
| ROLL-FORWARD OF PROVED RESERVES | |||||
| TWELVE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2011 | |||||
| BASED ON SEC PRICING OF TRAILING 12-MONTH AVERAGE PRICES AT DECEMBER 31, 2011 | |||||
| (unaudited) | |||||
? | |||||
? | ? | ? | Bcfe(a) | ||
| Beginning balance, January 1, 2011 | ? | ? | 17,096 | ||
| Production | (1,194 | ) | |||
| Acquisitions | 30 | ||||
| Divestitures | (2,776 | ) | |||
| Revisions ? changes to previous estimates | (64 | ) | |||
| Revisions ? price | 14 | ||||
| Extensions and discoveries | ? | 5,683 | ? | ||
| Ending balance, December 31, 2011 | ? | 18,789 | ? | ||
? | |||||
| Proved reserves growth rate before acquisitions and divestitures | 26 | % | |||
| Proved reserves growth rate after acquisitions and divestitures | 10 | % | |||
? | |||||
| Proved developed reserves | 10,106 | ||||
| Proved developed reserves percentage | 54 | % | |||
? | |||||
| PV-10 ($ in billions)(a) | $ | 19.9 | |||
(a) | ? | Reserve volumes and PV-10 value estimated using SEC reserve recognition standards and pricing assumptions based on the trailing 12-month average first-day-of-the-month prices as of December 31, 2011 of $4.12 per mcf of natural gas and $95.97 per bbl of oil, before field differential adjustments. |
(b) | Net of well cost carries of $2.570 billion associated with the Statoil-Marcellus, Total-Barnett, CNOOC-Eagle Ford and CNOOC-Niobrara joint ventures. | |
(c) | Includes 64 bcfe of downward revisions resulting from changes to previous estimates and excludes positive revisions of 14 bcfe resulting from higher oil prices using the average first-day-of-the-month price for the twelve months ended December 31, 2011, compared to the twelve months ended December 31, 2010. |
? | |||||||||||
? | |||||||||||
| CHESAPEAKE ENERGY CORPORATION | |||||||||||
| RECONCILIATION OF 2011 ADDITIONS TO NATURAL GAS AND OIL PROPERTIES | |||||||||||
| BASED ON 10-YEAR AVERAGE NYMEX STRIP PRICES AT DECEMBER 31, 2011 | |||||||||||
| ($ in millions, except per-unit data) | |||||||||||
| (unaudited) | |||||||||||
? | |||||||||||
? | ? | ? | Proved Reserves | ? | ? | ? | |||||
? | ? | Cost | ? | Bcfe(a) | ? | $/Mcfe | |||||
| PROVED PROPERTIES: | |||||||||||
Well costs on proved properties(b) |
|
|
| (c) | 0.99 | ||||||
| Acquisition of proved properties | 48 | 30 | 1.61 | ||||||||
| Sale of proved properties | ? | (2,612 | ) | (2,776 | ) | 0.94 | |||||
| Total net proved properties | ? | 3,516 | ? | 3,377 | ? | 1.04 | |||||
? | |||||||||||
| Revisions ? price | ? | 99 | ? | ||||||||
? | |||||||||||
| UNPROVED PROPERTIES: | |||||||||||
| Well costs on unproved properties | 1,465 | ? | ? | ||||||||
| Acquisition of unproved properties, net | 3,516 | ? | ? | ||||||||
| Sale of unproved properties | ? | (4,432 | ) | ? | ? | ? | |||||
| Total net unproved properties | ? | 549 | ? | ? | ? | ? | |||||
? | |||||||||||
| OTHER: | |||||||||||
| Capitalized interest on unproved properties | 727 | ? | ? | ||||||||
| Geological and geophysical costs | 192 | ? | ? | ||||||||
| Asset retirement obligations | ? | 3 | ? | ? | ? | ? | |||||
| Total other | ? | 922 | ? | ? | ? | ? | |||||
? | |||||||||||
| Total | $ | 4,987 | ? | 3,476 | ? | 1.43 | |||||
? | ||||
? | ||||
| CHESAPEAKE ENERGY CORPORATION | ||||
| ROLL-FORWARD OF PROVED RESERVES | ||||
| TWELVE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2011 | ||||
| BASED ON 10-YEAR AVERAGE NYMEX STRIP PRICES AT DECEMBER 31, 2011 | ||||
| (unaudited) | ||||
? | ||||
? | ? | Bcfe(a) | ||
| Beginning balance, January 1, 2011 | ? | 17,605 | ||
| Production | (1,194 | ) | ||
| Acquisitions | 30 | |||
| Divestitures | (2,776 | ) | ||
| Revisions ? changes to previous estimates | (64 | ) | ||
| Revisions ? price | 99 | |||
| Extensions and discoveries | ? | 6,187 | ? | |
| Ending balance, December 31, 2011 | ? | 19,887 | ? | |
? | ||||
| Proved reserves growth rate before acquisitions and divestitures | 29 | % | ||
| Proved reserves growth rate after acquisitions and divestitures | 13 | % | ||
? | ||||
| Proved developed reserves | 10,557 | |||
| Proved developed reserves percentage | 53 | % | ||
? | ||||
| PV-10 ($ in billions)(a) | $ | 23.8 | ||
| ? | Reserve volumes and PV-10 value estimated using SEC reserve recognition standards and 10-year average NYMEX strip prices as of December 31, 2011 of $4.92 per mcf of natural gas and $92.61 per bbl of oil, before field differential adjustments. Futures prices, such as the 10-year average NYMEX strip prices, represent an unbiased consensus estimate by market participants about the likely prices to be received for our future production. Chesapeake uses such forward-looking market-based data in developing its drilling plans, assessing its capital expenditure needs and projecting future cash flows. Chesapeake believes these prices are better indicators of the likely economic producibility of proved reserves than the trailing 12-month average price required by the SEC's reporting rule. |
(b) | Net of well cost carries of $2.570 billion associated with the Statoil-Marcellus, Total-Barnett, CNOOC-Eagle Ford and CNOOC-Niobrara joint ventures. | |
(c) | Includes 64 bcfe of downward revisions resulting from changes to previous estimates and excludes positive revisions of 99 bcfe resulting from higher natural gas and oil prices using 10-year average NYMEX strip prices as of December 31, 2011, compared to December 31, 2010. |
? | ||||||||
? | ||||||||
| CHESAPEAKE ENERGY CORPORATION | ||||||||
| RECONCILIATION OF PV-10 | ||||||||
| ($ in millions) | ||||||||
| (unaudited) | ||||||||
? | ||||||||
? | ? | December 31, | ? | ? | December 31, | |||
? | ? | ? | 2011 | ? | ? | 2010 | ||
? | ||||||||
| Standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows | $ | 15,630 | $ | 13,183 | ||||
? | ||||||||
| Discounted future cash flows for income taxes | ? | 4,247 | ? | 1,963 | ||||
? | ||||||||
| Discounted future net cash flows before income taxes (PV-10) | $ | 19,877 | $ | 15,146 | ||||
? | ||||||||
PV-10 is discounted (at 10%) future net cash flows before income taxes.
The standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows includes
the effects of estimated future income tax expenses and is calculated in
accordance with Accounting Standards Topic 932. Management uses PV-10 as
one measure of the value of the company's current proved reserves and to
compare relative values among peer companies without regard to income
taxes. We also understand that securities analysts and rating agencies
use this measure in similar ways. While PV-10 is based on prices, costs
and discount factors which are consistent from company to company, the
standardized measure is dependent on the unique tax situation of each
individual company.
The company′s December 31, 2011 PV-10 and standardized measure were
calculated using the trailing 12-month average first-day-of-the-month
prices as of December 31, 2011 of $4.12 per mcf and $95.97 per bbl. The
company′s December 31, 2010 PV-10 and standardized measure were
calculated using the trailing 12-month average first day-of-the-month
prices as of December 31, 2010 of $4.38 per mcf and $79.42 per bbl.
? | ||||||||||||||||||
? | ||||||||||||||||||
| CHESAPEAKE ENERGY CORPORATION | ||||||||||||||||||
| SUPPLEMENTAL DATA ? NATURAL GAS AND LIQUIDS SALES AND INTEREST EXPENSE | ||||||||||||||||||
| (unaudited) | ||||||||||||||||||
? | ||||||||||||||||||
? | ? | Three Months Ended | ? | ? | Twelve Months Ended | |||||||||||||
| December 31, | December 31, | |||||||||||||||||
? | 2011 | ? | ? | ? | 2010 | ? | ? | 2011 | ? | ? | ? | 2010 | ? | |||||
? | ? | |||||||||||||||||
| Natural Gas and Liquids Sales ($ in millions): | ||||||||||||||||||
Natural gas sales | $ | 720 | $ | 666 | $ | 3,133 | $ | 3,169 | ||||||||||
Natural gas derivatives ? realized gains (losses) | 335 | 563 | 1,656 | 1,982 | ||||||||||||||
Natural gas derivatives ? unrealized gains (losses) | ? | 24 | ? | ? | (109 | ) | ? | (669 | ) | ? | 425 | ? | ||||||
? | ||||||||||||||||||
Total Natural Gas Sales | ? | 1,079 | ? | ? | 1,120 | ? | ? | 4,120 | ? | ? | 5,576 | ? | ||||||
? | ||||||||||||||||||
Liquids sales | 646 | 340 | 2,126 | 1,079 | ||||||||||||||
Oil derivatives ? realized gains (losses) | (20 | ) | 8 | (102 | ) | 74 | ||||||||||||
Oil derivatives ? unrealized gains (losses) | ? | (369 | ) | ? | (519 | ) | ? | (120 | ) | ? | (1,082 | ) | ||||||
? | ||||||||||||||||||
Total Liquids Sales | ? | 257 | ? | ? | (171 | ) | ? | 1,904 | ? | ? | 71 | ? | ||||||
? | ||||||||||||||||||
Total Natural Gas and Liquids Sales | $ | 1,336 | ? | $ | 949 | ? | $ | 6,024 | ? | $ | 5,647 | ? | ||||||
? | ||||||||||||||||||
Average Sales Price ? excluding gains (losses) on derivatives: | ||||||||||||||||||
Natural gas ($ per mcf) | $ | 2.64 | $ | 2.83 | $ | 3.12 | $ | 3.43 | ||||||||||
Liquids ($ per bbl) | $ | 66.18 | $ | 61.19 | $ | 67.11 | $ | 58.67 | ||||||||||
Natural gas equivalent ($ per mcfe) | $ | 4.13 | $ | 3.74 | $ | 4.40 | $ | 4.10 | ||||||||||
? | ||||||||||||||||||
Average Sales Price ? excluding unrealized gains (losses) on | ||||||||||||||||||
Natural gas ($ per mcf) | $ | 3.87 | $ | 5.22 | $ | 4.77 | $ | 5.57 | ||||||||||
Liquids ($ per bbl) | $ | 64.12 | $ | 62.62 | $ | 63.90 | $ | 62.71 | ||||||||||
Natural gas equivalent ($ per mcfe) | $ | 5.08 | $ | 5.87 | $ | 5.70 | $ | 6.09 | ||||||||||
? | ||||||||||||||||||
| Interest Expense (Income) ($ in millions): | ||||||||||||||||||
Interest (a) | $ | 11 | $ | 6 | $ | 30 | $ | 99 | ||||||||||
Derivatives ? realized (gains) losses | 1 | (8 | ) | 7 | (14 | ) | ||||||||||||
Derivatives ? unrealized (gains) losses | ? | (5 | ) | ? | 9 | ? | ? | 7 | ? | ? | (66 | ) | ||||||
Total Interest Expense | $ | 7 | ? | $ | 7 | ? | $ | 44 | ? | $ | 19 | ? | ||||||
(a) | ? | Net of amounts capitalized. |
? | ||||||||||
? | ||||||||||
| CHESAPEAKE ENERGY CORPORATION | ||||||||||
| CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED CASH FLOW DATA | ||||||||||
| ($ in millions) | ||||||||||
| (unaudited) | ||||||||||
? | ||||||||||
| THREE MONTHS ENDED: | ? | ? | December 31, | ? | ? | December 31, | ||||
? | ? | ? | 2011 | ? | ? | ? | ? | 2010 | ? | |
? | ||||||||||
| Beginning cash | $ | 111 | ? | $ | 609 | ? | ||||
? | ||||||||||
| Cash provided by operating activities | ? | 2,179 | ? | ? | 1,145 | ? | ||||
? | ||||||||||
| Cash flows from investing activities: | ||||||||||
| Well costs on proved properties | (1,532 | ) | (1,502 | ) | ||||||
| Well costs on unproved properties | (590 | ) | (22 | ) | ||||||
| Acquisition of proved properties | (2 | ) | (104 | ) | ||||||
| Sale of proved properties | ? | 31 | ||||||||
| Acquisition of unproved properties, net | (1,161 | ) | (2,499 | ) | ||||||
| Sale of unproved properties | 1,256 | 1,081 | ||||||||
| Investments, net | (25 | ) | (21 | ) | ||||||
| Other property and equipment, net | 37 | 198 | ||||||||
| Other | ? | (80 | ) | ? | 1 | ? | ||||
| Total cash used in investing activities | ? | (2,097 | ) | ? | (2,837 | ) | ||||
? | ||||||||||
| Cash provided by financing activities | ? | 158 | ? | ? | 1,185 | ? | ||||
? | ||||||||||
| Ending cash | $ | 351 | ? | $ | 102 | ? | ||||
? | ||||||||||
| TWELVE MONTHS ENDED: | ? | ? | December 31, | ? | ? | December 31, | ||||
? | ? | ? | 2011 | ? | ? | ? | ? | 2010 | ? | |
? | ||||||||||
| Beginning cash | $ | 102 | ? | $ | 307 | ? | ||||
? | ||||||||||
| Cash provided by operating activities | ? | 5,903 | ? | ? | 5,117 | ? | ||||
? | ||||||||||
| Cash flows from investing activities: | ||||||||||
| Well costs on proved properties | (6,002 | ) | (5,117 | ) | ||||||
| Well costs on unproved properties | (1,465 | ) | (125 | ) | ||||||
| Acquisition of proved properties | (48 | ) | (243 | ) | ||||||
| Sale of proved properties | 2,678 | 2,863 | ||||||||
| Acquisition of unproved properties, net | (4,415 | ) | (6,258 | ) | ||||||
| Sale of unproved properties | 4,462 | 985 | ||||||||
| Investments, net | 101 | (134 | ) | |||||||
| Other property and equipment, net | (1,036 | ) | (443 | ) | ||||||
| Other | ? | (87 | ) | ? | (31 | ) | ||||
| Total cash used in investing activities | ? | (5,812 | ) | ? | (8,503 | ) | ||||
? | ||||||||||
| Cash provided by financing activities | ? | 158 | ? | ? | 3,181 | ? | ||||
? | ||||||||||
| Ending cash | $ | 351 | ? | $ | 102 | ? | ||||
? | |||||||||||||
? | |||||||||||||
| CHESAPEAKE ENERGY CORPORATION | |||||||||||||
| RECONCILIATION OF OPERATING CASH FLOW AND EBITDA | |||||||||||||
| ($ in millions) | |||||||||||||
| (unaudited) | |||||||||||||
? | |||||||||||||
| THREE MONTHS ENDED: | ? | ? | December 31, | ? | September 30, | ? | December 31, | ||||||
? | ? | ? | 2011 | ? | ? | ? | 2011 | ? | ? | ? | 2010 | ? | |
? | |||||||||||||
| CASH PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES | $ | 2,179 | $ | 1,631 | $ | 1,145 | |||||||
? | |||||||||||||
| Changes in assets and liabilities | ? | (868 | ) | ? | (222 | ) | ? | 225 | ? | ||||
? | |||||||||||||
| OPERATING CASH FLOW(a) | $ | 1,311 | ? | $ | 1,409 | ? | $ | 1,370 | ? | ||||
? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ||||||
| THREE MONTHS ENDED: | December 31, | September 30, | December 31, | ||||||||||
? | ? | ? | 2011 | ? | ? | ? | 2011 | ? | ? | ? | 2010 | ? | |
? | |||||||||||||
| NET INCOME | $ | 487 | $ | 922 | $ | 223 | |||||||
? | |||||||||||||
| Income tax expense | 312 | 589 | 140 | ||||||||||
| Interest expense | 7 | 4 | 7 | ||||||||||
| Depreciation and amortization of other assets | 85 | 75 | 61 | ||||||||||
Natural gas and liquids depreciation, depletion and amortization | ? | 484 | ? | ? | 423 | ? | ? | 368 | ? | ||||
? | |||||||||||||
| EBITDA(b) | $ | 1,375 | ? | $ | 2,013 | ? | $ | 799 | ? | ||||
? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ||||||
| THREE MONTHS ENDED: | December 31, | September 30, | December 31, | ||||||||||
? | ? | ? | 2011 | ? | ? | ? | 2011 | ? | ? | ? | 2010 | ? | |
? | |||||||||||||
| CASH PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES | $ | 2,179 | $ | 1,631 | $ | 1,145 | |||||||
? | |||||||||||||
| Changes in assets and liabilities | (868 | ) | (222 | ) | 225 | ||||||||
| Interest expense | 7 | 4 | 7 | ||||||||||
| Unrealized gains (losses) on natural gas and oil derivatives | (345 | ) | 631 | (628 | ) | ||||||||
| Gains (losses) on sales and impairments of fixed assets | 397 | (3 | ) | 153 | |||||||||
| Gains (losses) on investments | 22 | (4 | ) | (13 | ) | ||||||||
| Stock-based compensation | (34 | ) | (40 | ) | (36 | ) | |||||||
| Other items | ? | 17 | ? | ? | 16 | ? | ? | (54 | ) | ||||
? | |||||||||||||
| EBITDA(b) | $ | 1,375 | ? | $ | 2,013 | ? | $ | 799 | ? | ||||
(a) | ? | Operating cash flow represents net cash provided by operating activities before changes in assets and liabilities. Operating cash flow is presented because management believes it is a useful adjunct to net cash provided by operating activities under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (GAAP). Operating cash flow is widely accepted as a financial indicator of a natural gas and oil company's ability to generate cash which is used to internally fund exploration and development activities and to service debt. This measure is widely used by investors and rating agencies in the valuation, comparison, rating and investment recommendations of companies within the natural gas and oil exploration and production industry. Operating cash flow is not a measure of financial performance under GAAP and should not be considered as an alternative to cash flows from operating, investing or financing activities as an indicator of cash flows, or as a measure of liquidity. |
(b) | Ebitda represents net income before income tax expense, interest expense and depreciation, depletion and amortization expense. Ebitda is presented as a supplemental financial measurement in the evaluation of our business. We believe that it provides additional information regarding our ability to meet our future debt service, capital expenditures and working capital requirements. This measure is widely used by investors and rating agencies in the valuation, comparison, rating and investment recommendations of companies. Ebitda is also a financial measurement that, with certain negotiated adjustments, is reported to our lenders pursuant to our bank credit agreements and is used in the financial covenants in our bank credit agreements. Ebitda is not a measure of financial performance under GAAP. Accordingly, it should not be considered as a substitute for net income, income from operations, or cash flow provided by operating activities prepared in accordance with GAAP. |
? | |||||||||
? | |||||||||
| CHESAPEAKE ENERGY CORPORATION | |||||||||
| RECONCILIATION OF OPERATING CASH FLOW AND EBITDA | |||||||||
| ($ in millions) | |||||||||
| (unaudited) | |||||||||
? | |||||||||
| TWELVE MONTHS ENDED: | ? | ? | December 31, | ? | December 31, | ||||
? | ? | ? | 2011 | ? | ? | ? | 2010 | ? | |
? | |||||||||
| CASH PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES | $ | 5,903 | $ | 5,117 | |||||
? | |||||||||
| Changes in assets and liabilities | ? | (594 | ) | ? | 51 | ? | |||
? | |||||||||
| OPERATING CASH FLOW(a) | $ | 5,309 | ? | $ | 5,168 | ? | |||
? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ||||
| TWELVE MONTHS ENDED: | December 31, | December 31, | |||||||
? | ? | ? | 2011 | ? | ? | ? | 2010 | ? | |
? | |||||||||
| NET INCOME | $ | 1,757 | $ | 1,774 | |||||
? | |||||||||
| Income tax expense | 1,123 | 1,110 | |||||||
| Interest expense | 44 | 19 | |||||||
| Depreciation and amortization of other assets | 291 | 220 | |||||||
| Natural gas and liquids depreciation, depletion and amortization | ? | 1,632 | ? | ? | 1,394 | ? | |||
? | |||||||||
| EBITDA(b) | $ | 4,847 | ? | $ | 4,517 | ? | |||
? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ||||
| TWELVE MONTHS ENDED: | December 31, | December 31, | |||||||
? | ? | ? | 2011 | ? | ? | ? | 2010 | ? | |
? | |||||||||
| CASH PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES | $ | 5,903 | $ | 5,117 | |||||
? | |||||||||
| Changes in assets and liabilities | (594 | ) | 51 | ||||||
| Interest expense | 44 | 19 | |||||||
| Unrealized gains (losses) on natural gas and oil derivatives | (789 | ) | (658 | ) | |||||
| Gains (losses) on sales and impairments of fixed assets | 391 | 116 | |||||||
| Gains on investments | 41 | 107 | |||||||
| Stock-based compensation | (153 | ) | (147 | ) | |||||
| Other items | ? | 4 | ? | ? | (88 | ) | |||
? | |||||||||
| EBITDA(b) | $ | 4,847 | ? | $ | 4,517 | ? | |||
(a) | ? | Operating cash flow represents net cash provided by operating activities before changes in assets and liabilities. Operating cash flow is presented because management believes it is a useful adjunct to net cash provided by operating activities under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (GAAP). Operating cash flow is widely accepted as a financial indicator of a natural gas and oil company's ability to generate cash which is used to internally fund exploration and development activities and to service debt. This measure is widely used by investors and rating agencies in the valuation, comparison, rating and investment recommendations of companies within the natural gas and oil exploration and production industry. Operating cash flow is not a measure of financial performance under GAAP and should not be considered as an alternative to cash flows from operating, investing or financing activities as an indicator of cash flows, or as a measure of liquidity. |
(b) | Ebitda represents net income before income tax expense, interest expense and depreciation, depletion and amortization expense. Ebitda is presented as a supplemental financial measurement in the evaluation of our business. We believe that it provides additional information regarding our ability to meet our future debt service, capital expenditures and working capital requirements. This measure is widely used by investors and rating agencies in the valuation, comparison, rating and investment recommendations of companies. Ebitda is also a financial measurement that, with certain negotiated adjustments, is reported to our lenders pursuant to our bank credit agreements and is used in the financial covenants in our bank credit agreements. Ebitda is not a measure of financial performance under GAAP. Accordingly, it should not be considered as a substitute for net income, income from operations, or cash flow provided by operating activities prepared in accordance with GAAP. |
? | |||||||||||||
? | |||||||||||||
| CHESAPEAKE ENERGY CORPORATION | |||||||||||||
| RECONCILIATION OF ADJUSTED EBITDA | |||||||||||||
| ($ in millions) | |||||||||||||
| (unaudited) | |||||||||||||
? | |||||||||||||
? | ? | December 31, | ? | September 30, | ? | December 31, | |||||||
| THREE MONTHS ENDED: | ? | ? | ? | 2011 | ? | ? | ? | 2011 | ? | ? | ? | 2010 | ? |
? | |||||||||||||
| EBITDA | $ | 1,375 | $ | 2,013 | $ | 799 | |||||||
? | |||||||||||||
| Adjustments: | |||||||||||||
| Unrealized (gains) losses on natural gas and oil derivatives | 345 | (631 | ) | 628 | |||||||||
| (Gains) losses on sales and impairments of fixed assets | (397 | ) | 3 | (153 | ) | ||||||||
| Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests | ? | (15 | ) | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ||||
? | |||||||||||||
| Adjusted EBITDA(a) | $ | 1,308 | ? | $ | 1,385 | ? | $ | 1,274 | ? | ||||
? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ||||
? | ? | December 31, | ? | December 31, | |||||
| TWELVE MONTHS ENDED: | ? | ? | ? | 2011 | ? | ? | ? | 2010 | ? |
? | |||||||||
| EBITDA | $ | 4,847 | $ | 4,517 | |||||
? | |||||||||
| Adjustments: | |||||||||
| Unrealized (gains) losses on natural gas and oil derivatives | 789 | 658 | |||||||
| (Gains) losses on sales and impairments of fixed assets | (391 | ) | (116 | ) | |||||
| Losses on purchases or exchanges of debt | 176 | 129 | |||||||
| Gains on investment activity, net | ? | (105 | ) | ||||||
| Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests | ? | (15 | ) | ? | ? | ? | |||
? | |||||||||
| Adjusted EBITDA(a) | $ | 5,406 | ? | $ | 5,083 | ? | |||
(a) | ? | Adjusted ebitda excludes certain items that management believes affect the comparability of operating results. The company discloses these non-GAAP financial measures as a useful adjunct to ebitda because: | ||
i. | ? | Management uses adjusted ebitda to evaluate the company′s operational trends and performance relative to other natural gas and oil producing companies. | ||
ii. | Adjusted ebitda is more comparable to estimates provided by securities analysts. | |||
iii. | Items excluded generally are one-time items or items whose timing or amount cannot be reasonably estimated. Accordingly, any guidance provided by the company generally excludes information regarding these types of items. | |||
? | ||||||||||||
? | ||||||||||||
| CHESAPEAKE ENERGY CORPORATION | ||||||||||||
| RECONCILIATION OF ADJUSTED NET INCOME AVAILABLE TO COMMON STOCKHOLDERS | ||||||||||||
| ($ in millions, except per-share data) | ||||||||||||
| (unaudited) | ||||||||||||
? | ||||||||||||
? | December 31, | ? | September 30, | ? | December 31, | |||||||
| THREE MONTHS ENDED: | ? | ? | 2011 | ? | ? | ? | 2011 | ? | ? | ? | 2010 | ? |
? | ||||||||||||
| Net income available to common stockholders | $ | 429 | $ | 879 | $ | 180 | ||||||
? | ||||||||||||
| Adjustments, net of tax: | ||||||||||||
| Unrealized (gains) losses on derivatives | 207 | (385 | ) | 392 | ||||||||
| (Gains) losses on sales and impairments of fixed assets | ? | (242 | ) | ? | 2 | ? | ? | (94 | ) | |||
? | ||||||||||||
| Adjusted net income available to common stockholders(a) | 394 | 496 | 478 | |||||||||
| Preferred stock dividends | ? | 43 | ? | ? | 43 | ? | ? | 43 | ? | |||
| Total adjusted net income | $ | 437 | ? | $ | 539 | ? | $ | 521 | ? | |||
? | ||||||||||||
| Weighted average fully diluted shares outstanding(b) | 750 | 753 | 746 | |||||||||
? | ||||||||||||
| Adjusted earnings per share assuming dilution(a) | $ | 0.58 | ? | $ | 0.72 | ? | $ | 0.70 | ? | |||
(a) | ? | Adjusted net income available to common stockholders and adjusted earnings per share assuming dilution exclude certain items that management believes affect the comparability of operating results. The company discloses these non-GAAP financial measures as a useful adjunct to GAAP earnings because: | ||
i. | ? | Management uses adjusted net income available to common stockholders to evaluate the company′s operational trends and performance relative to other natural gas and oil producing companies. | ||
ii. | Adjusted net income available to common stockholders is more comparable to earnings estimates provided by securities analysts. | |||
iii. | Items excluded generally are one-time items or items whose timing or amount cannot be reasonably estimated. Accordingly, any guidance provided by the company generally excludes information regarding these types of items. | |||
(b) | Weighted average fully diluted shares outstanding include shares that were considered antidilutive for calculating earnings per share in accordance with GAAP. | |||
? | ||||||||
? | ||||||||
| CHESAPEAKE ENERGY CORPORATION | ||||||||
| RECONCILIATION OF ADJUSTED NET INCOME AVAILABLE TO COMMON STOCKHOLDERS | ||||||||
| ($ in millions, except per-share data) | ||||||||
| (unaudited) | ||||||||
? | ||||||||
? | December 31, | ? | December 31, | |||||
| TWELVE MONTHS ENDED: | ? | ? | 2011 | ? | ? | ? | 2010 | ? |
? | ||||||||
| Net income available to common stockholders | $ | 1,570 | $ | 1,663 | ||||
? | ||||||||
| Adjustments, net of tax: | ||||||||
| Unrealized (gains) losses on derivatives | 486 | 364 | ||||||
| (Gains) losses on sales and impairments of fixed assets | (238 | ) | (71 | ) | ||||
| Losses on purchases or exchanges of debt | 107 | 80 | ||||||
| Gains on investment activity, net | ? | (65 | ) | |||||
| (Gain) loss on foreign currency derivatives | ? | 11 | ? | ? | ? | ? | ||
? | ||||||||
| Adjusted net income available to common stockholders(a) | 1,936 | 1,971 | ||||||
| Preferred stock dividends | ? | 172 | ? | ? | 111 | ? | ||
| Total adjusted net income | $ | 2,108 | ? | $ | 2,082 | ? | ||
? | ||||||||
| Weighted average fully diluted shares outstanding(b) | 752 | 706 | ||||||
? | ||||||||
| Adjusted earnings per share assuming dilution(a) | $ | 2.80 | ? | $ | 2.95 | ? | ||
(a) | ? | Adjusted net income available to common stockholders and adjusted earnings per share assuming dilution exclude certain items that management believes affect the comparability of operating results. The company discloses these non-GAAP financial measures as a useful adjunct to GAAP earnings because: | ||
i. | ? | Management uses adjusted net income available to common stockholders to evaluate the company′s operational trends and performance relative to other natural gas and oil producing companies. | ||
ii. | Adjusted net income available to common stockholders is more comparable to earnings estimates provided by securities analysts. | |||
iii. | Items excluded generally are one-time items or items whose timing or amount cannot be reasonably estimated. Accordingly, any guidance provided by the company generally excludes information regarding these types of items. | |||
(b) | Weighted average fully diluted shares outstanding include shares that were considered antidilutive for calculating earnings per share in accordance with GAAP. | |||
SCHEDULE 'A?
CHESAPEAKE′S OUTLOOK AS OF FEBRUARY 21, 2012
Our policy is to periodically provide guidance on certain factors that
affect our future financial performance. The primary changes from our
November 3, 2011 Outlook are in italicized bold and
reflect projected natural gas curtailments of approximately 130 bcf in
2012 and exclude the production effects of potential Mississippi Lime
and Permian Basin transactions.
? | ||||||
| Chesapeake Energy Corporation Consolidated Projections | ||||||
| For Years Ending December 31, 2012 and 2013 | ||||||
? | ||||||
? | ? | Year Ending 12/31/12 | ? | ? | Year Ending 12/31/13 | |
Estimated Production: | ||||||
Natural gas ? bcf | 950 ? 990 | 1,020 ? 1,060 | ||||
Liquids ? mbbls | 53,000 ? 57,000 | 74,000 ? 78,000 | ||||
Natural gas equivalent ? bcfe | 1,268 ? 1,332 | 1,464 ? 1,528 | ||||
? | ||||||
Daily natural gas equivalent midpoint ? mmcfe | 3,550 | 4,100 | ||||
? | ||||||
Year over year (YOY) estimated production increase excluding asset sales | 12% | 20% | ||||
YOY estimated production increase | 9% | 15% | ||||
? | ||||||
NYMEX Price(a) (for calculation of realized hedging effects only): | ||||||
Natural gas - $/mcf | $3.40 | $5.00 | ||||
Oil - $/bbl | $100.03 | $100.00 | ||||
? | ||||||
Estimated Realized Hedging Effects (based on assumed NYMEX prices above): | ||||||
Natural gas - $/mcf | $0.37 | $0.02 | ||||
Liquids - $/bbl | $(2.99) | $(0.76) | ||||
? | ||||||
Estimated Gathering/Marketing/Transportation Differentials to NYMEX Prices: | ||||||
Natural gas - $/mcf | $0.90 ? $1.00 | $0.90 ? $1.00 | ||||
Liquids - $/bbl(b) | $25.00 ? $30.00 | $20.00 ? $25.00 | ||||
? | ||||||
Operating Costs per Mcfe of Projected Production: | ||||||
Production expense | $0.90 ? 1.00 | $0.90 ? 1.00 | ||||
Production taxes (~ 5% of O&G revenues) | $0.20 ? 0.25 | $0.30 ? 0.35 | ||||
General and administrative(c) | $0.39 ? 0.44 | $0.39 ? 0.44 | ||||
Stock-based compensation (non-cash) | $0.04 ? 0.06 | $0.04 ? 0.06 | ||||
DD&A of natural gas and liquids assets | $1.40 ? 1.60 | $1.50 ? 1.70 | ||||
Depreciation of other assets | $0.25 ? 0.30 | $0.30 ? 0.35 | ||||
Interest expense(d) | $0.05 ? 0.10 | $0.05 ? 0.10 | ||||
? | ||||||
Other ($ millions): | ||||||
Marketing, gathering and compression net margin(e) | $100 ? 110 | $125 ? 135 | ||||
Oilfield services net margin(e) | $200 ? 250 | $300 ? 400 | ||||
Other income (including equity investments) | $125 ? 175 | $125 ? 175 | ||||
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest(f) | $(180) ? (200) | $(200) ? (240) | ||||
? | ||||||
Book Tax Rate | 39% | 39% | ||||
| ||||||
Weighted average shares outstanding (in millions): | ||||||
Basic | 640 ? 645 | 645 ? 650 | ||||
Diluted | 753 ? 758 | 758 ? 763 | ||||
? | ||||||
? | ||||||
Year Ending 12/31/12 | Year Ending 12/31/13 | |||||
| ($ millions) | ||||||
Operating cash flow before changes in assets and liabilities(g)(h) | $4,500 ? 5,200 | $7,500 ? 8,500 | ||||
? | ||||||
Well costs on proved properties | ($6,000 ? 6,500) | ($6,500 ? 7,500) | ||||
Well costs on unproved properties | ($1,000) | ($1,000) | ||||
Acquisition of unproved properties, net | ($1,400) | ($1,000 ? 1,250) | ||||
Sale of proved and unproved properties | $8,000 ? 10,000 | $3,000 ? 4,000 | ||||
Subtotal of net investment in proved and unproved properties | ($400) ? 1,100 | ($5,500 ? 5,750) | ||||
? | ||||||
Investment in oilfield services, midstream and other | ($2,500 ? 3,500) | ($2,000 ? 2,500) | ||||
Monetization of oilfield services, midstream and other assets | $2,000 | $1,000 ? 1,500 | ||||
Subtotal of net investment in oilfield services, midstream and other | ($500 ? 1,500) | ($1,000) | ||||
? | ||||||
Interest and dividends | ($1,000 ? 1,250) | ($1,000 ? 1,250) | ||||
? | ? | |||||
Total budgeted cash flow surplus (deficit) | $2,600 ? 3,550 | $0 ? 500 | ||||
(a) | ? | NYMEX natural gas prices have been updated for actual contract prices through February 2012 and NYMEX oil prices have been updated for actual contract prices through January 2012. |
(b) | Differentials include effects of natural gas liquids. | |
(c) | Excludes expenses associated with non-cash stock-based compensation. | |
(d) | Does not include gains or losses on interest rate derivatives. | |
(e) | Includes revenue and operating costs and excludes depreciation and amortization of other assets. | |
(f) | Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests of Chesapeake Granite Wash Trust, CHK Utica Preferred Interest and potential Cleveland/Tonkawa Preferred Interest. | |
(g) | A non-GAAP financial measure. We are unable to provide a reconciliation to projected cash provided by operating activities, the most comparable GAAP measure, because of uncertainties associated with projecting future changes in assets and liabilities. | |
(h) | Assumes NYMEX prices on open contracts of $3.00 to $4.00 per mcf and $100.00 per bbl in 2012 and $4.50 to $5.50 per mcf and $100.00 per bbl in 2013. | |
? |
Commodity Hedging Activities
Chesapeake enters into natural gas and oil derivative transactions in
order to mitigate a portion of its exposure to adverse market changes in
natural gas and oil prices. Please see the quarterly reports on Form
10-Q and annual reports on Form 10-K filed by Chesapeake with the
Securities and Exchange Commission for detailed information about
derivative instruments the company uses, its quarter-end natural gas and
oil derivative positions and the accounting for commodity derivatives.
At February 21, 2012, the company does not have any open natural gas
swaps in place. The company currently has $176 million of net hedging
gains related to closed natural gas contracts and premiums for call
options for future production periods.
| ? | ? |
| ? | ? |
| ? | ? |
| ? | ? |
| ? | ? |
| ? | ? |
| ||||||||
Q1 2012 | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | 158 | ? | ? | |||||||||||||
Q2 2012 | 195 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Q3 2012 | 32 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Q4 2012 | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | 15 | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? |
Total 2012 | ? | ? | 0 | ? | ? | ? | $ | 0.00 | ? | ? | ? | 970 | ? | ? | ? | 0 | % | ? | ? | $ | 400 | ? | ? | ? | $ | 0.41 |
? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? |
Total 2013 | ? | ? | 0 | ? | ? | ? | $ | 0.00 | ? | ? | ? | 1,040 | ? | ? | ? | 0 | % | ? | ? | $ | 21 | ? | ? | ? | $ | 0.02 |
Total 2014 | ? | ? | 0 | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | $ | (32 | ) | ? | ? | ? | ? |
Total 2015 | ? | ? | 0 | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | $ | (103 | ) | ? | ? | ? | ? |
Total 2016 ? 2022 | ? | ? | 0 | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | $ | (110 | ) | ? | ? | ? | ? |
The company currently has the following natural gas written call options
in place for 2012 through 2020:
? | ? | ? |
| ? | ? |
| ? | ? |
| ? | ? |
| |||||
Q1 2012 | ? | ? | 40 | ? | ? | 6.54 | ? | ? | ? | ? | |||||||
Q2 2012 | 40 | 6.54 | |||||||||||||||
Q3 2012 | 40 | 6.54 | |||||||||||||||
Q4 2012 | ? | ? | 41 | ? | ? | ? | ? | 6.54 | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? |
Total 2012 | ? | ? | 161 | ? | ? | ? | $ | 6.54 | ? | ? | ? | 970 | ? | ? | ? | 17 | % |
Total 2013 | ? | ? | 415 | ? | ? | ? | $ | 6.44 | ? | ? | ? | 1,040 | ? | ? | ? | 40 | % |
Total 2014 | ? | ? | 330 | ? | ? | ? | $ | 6.43 | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? |
Total 2015 | ? | ? | 116 | ? | ? | ? | $ | 6.45 | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? |
Total 2016 ? 2020 | ? | ? | 349 | ? | ? | ? | $ | 8.18 | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? |
The company has the following natural gas basis protection swaps in
place for 2012 through 2022:
? | ? | ? | ||||||
Volume (Bcf) | ? | ? | Avg. NYMEX less | |||||
2012 | 51 | $ | 0.78 | |||||
2013 | 44 | $ | 0.21 | |||||
2014 - 2022 | 67 | ? | $ | 0.42 | ||||
Totals | 162 | ? | $ | 0.47 | ||||
At February 21, 2012, the company has the following open crude oil swaps
in place for 2012 and through 2015. In addition, the company has $105
million of net hedging gains related to closed crude oil contracts and
premiums for call options for future production periods.
? | ? | ? |
| ? | ? |
| ? | ? |
| ? | ? |
| ? | ? |
| ? | ? |
| ||||||||
Q1 2012 | ? | ? | 5,829 | ? | ? | 101.70 | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | (26 | ) | ? | ? | ||||||||||
Q2 2012 | 6,871 | 102.27 | (51 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Q3 2012 | 5,835 | 103.16 | (65 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Q4 2012 | ? | ? | 5,383 | ? | ? | ? | ? | 102.85 | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | (74 | ) | ? | ? | ? | ? |
Total 2012(a) | ? | ? | 23,918 | ? | ? | ? | $ | 102.48 | ? | ? | ? | 55,000 | ? | ? | ? | 43 | % | ? | ? | $ | (216 | ) | ? | ? | $ | (3.93) |
? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? |
Total 2013 | ? | ? | 4,024 | ? | ? | ? | $ | 102.59 | ? | ? | ? | 76,000 | ? | ? | ? | 5 | % | ? | ? | $ | 26 | ? | ? | ? | $ | 0.35 |
Total 2014 | ? | ? | 713 | ? | ? | ? | $ | 88.27 | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | $ | (104 | ) | ? | ? | ? | ? |
Total 2015 | ? | ? | 500 | ? | ? | ? | $ | 88.75 | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | $ | 267 | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? |
Total 2016 ? 2021 | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | $ | 132 | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? |
(a) | ? | Certain hedging contracts include knockout swaps with provisions limiting the counterparty′s exposure below prices of $60.00 covering 732 mbbls in 2012. |
The company currently has the following crude oil written call options
in place for 2011 through 2017:
? | ? | ? |
| ? | ? |
| ? | ? |
| ? | ? |
| |||||
Q1 2012 | ? | ? | 1,224 | ? | ? | 100.00 | ? | ? | ? | ? | |||||||
Q2 2012 | - | - | |||||||||||||||
Q3 2012 | 1,840 | 106.38 | |||||||||||||||
Q4 2012 | ? | ? | 2,300 | ? | ? | ? | ? | 106.45 | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? |
Total 2012 | ? | ? | 5,364 | ? | ? | ? | $ | 104.95 | ? | ? | ? | 55,000 | ? | ? | ? | 10 | % |
? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? |
Total 2013 | ? | ? | 24,953 | ? | ? | ? | $ | 96.88 | ? | ? | ? | 76,000 | ? | ? | ? | 33 | % |
Total 2014 | ? | ? | 23,620 | ? | ? | ? | $ | 98.62 | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? |
Total 2015 | ? | ? | 27,048 | ? | ? | ? | $ | 100.99 | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? |
Total 2016 ? 2017 | ? | ? | 24,220 | ? | ? | ? | $ | 100.07 | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? |
? | |||||||||||||||||
? | |||||||||||||||||
SCHEDULE 'B?
CHESAPEAKE′S OUTLOOK AS OF NOVEMBER 3, 2011
(PROVIDED
FOR REFERENCE ONLY)
NOW SUPERSEDED BY OUTLOOK AS OF FEBRUARY
21, 2012
Our policy is to periodically provide guidance on certain factors that
affect our future financial performance. As of November 3, 2011, we are
using the following key assumptions in our projections for 2011, 2012
and 2013.
The primary changes from our July 28, 2011 Outlook are in italicized
bold and are explained as follows:
1) First projections for full-year 2013 have been provided;
2) Projected effects of changes in our hedging positions have been
updated;
3) Certain cost assumptions have been updated;
4) Cash flow and proved well costs projections have been updated; and
5) Stand-alone Outlooks prior to consolidation eliminations are being
provided for the first time for wholly owned subsidiaries Chesapeake
Oilfield Services, L.L.C. and Chesapeake Midstream Development, L.P.
? | |||||||
? | |||||||
| Chesapeake Energy Corporation Consolidated Projections | |||||||
| For Years Ending December 31, 2011, 2012 and 2013 | |||||||
? | |||||||
? | ? | Year Ending 12/31/11 | ? | Year Ending 12/31/12 | ? | Year Ending 12/31/13 | |
Estimated Production: | |||||||
Natural gas ? bcf | 970 ? 990 | 1,000 ? 1,040 | 1,020 ? 1,060 | ||||
Liquids ? mbbls | 31,000 ? 33,000 | 53,000 ? 57,000 | 72,000 ? 76,000 | ||||
Natural gas equivalent ? bcfe | 1,156 ? 1,188 | 1,318 ? 1,382 | 1,452 ? 1,516 | ||||
? | |||||||
Daily natural gas equivalent midpoint ? mmcfe | 3,200 | 3,700 | 4,060 | ||||
? | |||||||
Year over year (YOY) estimated production increase | 13% | 15% | 10% | ||||
YOY estimated production increase excluding asset sales | 24% | 16% | 11% | ||||
NYMEX Price(a) (for calculation of realized hedging effects only): | |||||||
Natural gas - $/mcf | $4.14 | $5.00 | $6.00 | ||||
Oil - $/bbl | $92.84 | $100.00 | $100.00 | ||||
? | |||||||
Estimated Realized Hedging Effects (based on assumed NYMEX prices above): | |||||||
Natural gas - $/mcf | $1.68 | $0.37 | $0.02 | ||||
Liquids - $/bbl | $(3.07) | $(2.60) | $(1.05) | ||||
? | |||||||
Estimated Gathering/Marketing/Transportation Differentials to NYMEX Prices: | |||||||
Natural gas - $/mcf | $0.90 ? $1.10 | $0.90 ? $1.10 | $0.90 ? $1.10 | ||||
Liquids - $/bbl(b) | $30.00 ? $35.00 | $25.00 ? $30.00 | $20.00 ? $25.00 | ||||
? | |||||||
Operating Costs per Mcfe of Projected Production: | |||||||
Production expense | $0.90 ? 1.00 | $0.90 ? 1.00 | $0.90 ? 1.00 | ||||
Production taxes (~ 5% of O&G revenues) | $0.25 ? 0.30 | $0.25 ? 0.30 | $0.30 ? 0.35 | ||||
General and administrative(c) | $0.36 ? 0.41 | $0.39 ? 0.44 | $0.39 ? 0.44 | ||||
Stock-based compensation (non-cash) | $0.07 ? 0.09 | $0.04 ? 0.06 | $0.04 ? 0.06 | ||||
DD&A of natural gas and liquids assets | $1.25 ? 1.40 | $1.40 ? 1.60 | $1.40 ? 1.60 | ||||
Depreciation of other assets | $0.20 ? 0.25 | $0.25 ? 0.30 | $0.25 ? 0.30 | ||||
Interest expense(d) | $0.05 ? 0.10 | $0.05 ? 0.10 | $0.05 ? 0.10 | ||||
? | |||||||
Other ($ millions): | |||||||
Marketing, gathering and compression net margin(e) | $120 ? 130 | $130 ? 140 | $140 ? 150 | ||||
Oilfield services net margin(e) | $120 ? 140 | $250 ? 300 | $350 ? 450 | ||||
Other income (including equity investments) | $100 ? 150 | $100 ? 150 | $100 ? 150 | ||||
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest(f) | $(3) ? (5) | $(35) ? (40) | $(40) ? (45) | ||||
? | |||||||
Book Tax Rate | 39% | 39% | 39% | ||||
? | |||||||
Weighted average shares outstanding (in millions): | |||||||
Basic | 635 ? 640 | 640 ? 645 | 645 ? 650 | ||||
Diluted | 748 ? 753 | 753 ? 758 | 758 ? 763 | ||||
? | |||||||
| $5,100 ? 5,200 | $6,000 ? 6,800 | $8,000 ? 9,000 | ||||
Proved well costs, net of JV carries ($ millions) | ($6,000 ? 6,500) | ($6,200 ? 6,800) | ($7,000 ? 8,000) | ||||
? | |||||||
? | |||||||
Chesapeake Oilfield Services, L.L.C. Projections(i) | |||||||
| Prior to Consolidation Eliminations For Years Ending December 31, 2011, 2012 and 2013 | |||||||
| ($ in millions) | |||||||
? | |||||||
? | ? | Year Ending 12/31/11 | ? | Year Ending 12/31/12 | ? | Year Ending 12/31/13 | |
? | |||||||
Revenue | $1,200 ? 1,300 | $2,000 ? 2,500 | $3,100 ? 3,600 | ||||
Operating expense | $900 ? 1,000 | $1,400 ? 1,700 | $2,100 ? 2,500 | ||||
Depreciation and amortization | $155 ? 165 | $210 ? 270 | $330 ? 390 | ||||
Interest expense | $40 ? 50 | $60 ? 70 | $50 ? 60 | ||||
? | |||||||
Operating cash flow before changes in assets and liabilities(g) | $200 ? 250 | $600 ? 700 | $900 ? 1,000 | ||||
Capital expenditures | ($800 ? 900) | ($800 ? 900) | ($800 ? 900) | ||||
? | |||||||
? | |||||||
| Chesapeake Midstream Development, L.P. Projections | |||||||
| Prior to Consolidation Eliminations For Years Ending December 31, 2011, 2012 and 2013 | |||||||
| ($ in millions) | |||||||
? | |||||||
? | ? | Year Ending 12/31/11 | ? | Year Ending 12/31/12 | ? | Year Ending 12/31/13 | |
? | |||||||
Revenue | $200 ? 220 | $250 ? 300 | $350 ? 400 | ||||
Operating expense | $150 ? 160 | $140 ? 170 | $170 ? 200 | ||||
Depreciation and amortization | $50 ? 60 | $100 ? 120 | $150 ? 170 | ||||
Interest expense | $10 ? 15 | $10 ? 15 | $15 ? 25 | ||||
Earnings from equity investments | $75 ? 100 | $75 ? 100 | $75 ? 100 | ||||
? | |||||||
Operating cash flow before changes in assets and liabilities(g) | $130 ? 150 | $175 ? 225 | $225 ? 275 | ||||
Capital expenditures (net of dropdowns) | ($50 ? 100) | ($800 ? 900) | ($800 ? 900) | ||||
(a) | ? | NYMEX natural gas prices have been updated for actual contract prices through November 2011 and NYMEX oil prices have been updated for actual contract prices through September 2011. |
(b) | Differentials include effects of natural gas liquids. | |
(c) | Excludes expenses associated with non-cash stock-based compensation. | |
(d) | Does not include gains or losses on interest rate derivatives. | |
(e) | Includes revenue and operating costs and excludes depreciation and amortization of other assets. | |
(f) | Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest of Chesapeake Granite Wash Trust. | |
(g) | A non-GAAP financial measure. We are unable to provide a reconciliation to projected cash provided by operating activities, the most comparable GAAP measure, because of uncertainties associated with projecting future changes in assets and liabilities. | |
(h) | Assumes NYMEX prices of $4.00 to $5.00 per mcf and $85.00 per bbl in 2011, $4.50 to $5.50 per mcf and $100.00 per bbl in 2012, and $5.50 to $6.50 per mcf and $100.00 per bbl in 2013. | |
(i) | Excludes investment in FTS International, LLC. | |
? |
Commodity Hedging Activities
Chesapeake enters into natural gas and oil derivative transactions in
order to mitigate a portion of its exposure to adverse market changes in
natural gas and oil prices. Please see the quarterly reports on Form
10-Q and annual reports on Form 10-K filed by Chesapeake with the
Securities and Exchange Commission for detailed information about
derivative instruments the company uses, its quarter-end natural gas and
oil derivative positions and the accounting for commodity derivatives.
At November 3, 2011, the company does not have any open natural gas
swaps in place. The company currently has $616 million of net hedging
gains related to closed natural gas contracts and premiums collected on
call options for future production periods.
| ? | ? |
| ? | ? |
| ? | ? |
| ? | ? |
| ? | ? |
| ? | ? |
| ||||||||
Q4 2011 | ? | ? | 0 | ? | ? | ? | $ | 0.00 | ? | ? | ? | 250 | ? | ? | ? | 0 | % | ? | ? | $ | 369 | ? | ? | ? | $ | 1.48 |
Q1 2012 | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | 158 | ? | ? | |||||||||||||
Q2 2012 | 195 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Q3 2012 | 32 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Q4 2012 | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | 15 | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? |
Total 2012 | ? | ? | 0 | ? | ? | ? | $ | 0.00 | ? | ? | ? | 1,020 | ? | ? | ? | 0 | % | ? | ? | $ | 400 | ? | ? | ? | $ | 0.39 |
? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? |
Total 2013 | ? | ? | 0 | ? | ? | ? | $ | 0.00 | ? | ? | ? | 1,040 | ? | ? | ? | 0 | % | ? | ? | $ | 21 | ? | ? | ? | $ | 0.02 |
Total 2014 | ? | ? | 0 | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | $ | (32 | ) | ? | ? | ? | ? |
Total 2015 | ? | ? | 0 | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | $ | (46 | ) | ? | ? | ? | ? |
Total 2016 ? 2022 | ? | ? | 0 | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | $ | (96 | ) | ? | ? | ? | ? |
The company currently has the following natural gas written call options
in place for 2011 through 2020:
? | ? | ? |
| ? | ? |
| ? | ? |
| ? | ? |
| |||||
Q4 2011 | ? | ? | 11 | ? | ? | ? | ? | 4.13 | ? | ? | ? | 250 | ? | ? | ? | 4 | % |
? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ||||||||||
Q1 2012 | 40 | 6.54 | |||||||||||||||
Q2 2012 | 40 | 6.54 | |||||||||||||||
Q3 2012 | 40 | 6.54 | |||||||||||||||
Q4 2012 | ? | ? | 41 | ? | ? | ? | ? | 6.54 | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? |
Total 2012 | ? | ? | 161 | ? | ? | ? | $ | 6.54 | ? | ? | ? | 1,020 | ? | ? | ? | 16 | % |
? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? |
Total 2013 | ? | ? | 415 | ? | ? | ? | $ | 6.44 | ? | ? | ? | 1,040 | ? | ? | ? | 40 | % |
Total 2014 | ? | ? | 330 | ? | ? | ? | $ | 6.43 | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? |
Total 2015 | ? | ? | 138 | ? | ? | ? | $ | 6.41 | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? |
Total 2016 ? 2020 | ? | ? | 393 | ? | ? | ? | $ | 7.93 | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? |
The company has the following natural gas basis protection swaps in
place for 2011 through 2022:
? | ? | Non-Appalachia | ? | ? | Appalachia | ||||||||||
Volume (Bcf) | ? | Avg. NYMEX less | Volume (Bcf) | ? | Avg. NYMEX plus | ||||||||||
2011 | 7 | $ | 0.82 | 12 | $ | 0.14 | |||||||||
2012 | 51 | $ | 0.78 | ? | $ | ? | |||||||||
2013 - 2022 | 29 | ? | $ | 0.69 | ? | ? | ? | $ | ? | ||||||
Totals | 87 | ? | $ | 0.75 | ? | 12 | ? | $ | 0.14 | ||||||
At November 3, 2011, the company has the following open crude oil swaps
in place for 2011 and through 2015. In addition, the company has $93
million of net hedging gains related to closed crude oil contracts and
premiums collected on call options for future production periods.
? | ? | ? |
| ? | ? |
| ? | ? |
| ? | ? |
| ? | ? |
| ? | ? |
| |||||||||
Q4 2011(a) | ? | ? | 440 | ? | ? | ? | $ | 97.17 | ? | ? | ? | 10,000 | ? | ? | ? | 4 | % | ? | ? | $ | (11 | ) | ? | ? | $ | (1.11 | ) |
? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ||||||||||||||||
Q1 2012 | 346 | 97.89 | (19 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Q2 2012 | 349 | 98.12 | (25 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Q3 2012 | 361 | 98.19 | (29 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Q4 2012 | ? | ? | 369 | ? | ? | ? | ? | 98.20 | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | (33 | ) | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? |
Total 2012(a) | ? | ? | 1,425 | ? | ? | ? | $ | 98.10 | ? | ? | ? | 55,000 | ? | ? | ? | 3 | % | ? | ? | $ | (106 | ) | ? | ? | $ | (1.92 | ) |
Total 2013 | ? | ? | 739 | ? | ? | ? | $ | 87.69 | ? | ? | ? | 74,000 | ? | ? | ? | 1 | % | ? | ? | $ | 26 | ? | ? | ? | $ | 0.36 | ? |
Total 2014 | ? | ? | 713 | ? | ? | ? | $ | 88.27 | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | $ | (159 | ) | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? |
Total 2015 | ? | ? | 500 | ? | ? | ? | $ | 88.75 | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | $ | 211 | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? |
Total 2016 ? 2021 | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | $ | 132 | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? |
(a) | ? | Certain hedging contracts include knockout swaps with provisions limiting the counterparty′s exposure below prices of $60.00 covering 276 mbbls in 2011 and 732 mbbls in 2012. |
The company currently has the following crude oil written call options
in place for 2011 through 2017:
? | ? | ? |
| ? | ? |
| ? | ? |
| ? | ? |
| |||||
Q4 2011 | ? | ? | 1,840 | ? | ? | ? | $ | 110.00 | ? | ? | ? | 10,000 | ? | ? | ? | 18 | % |
? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ||||||||||
Q1 2012 | 4,047 | 100.00 | |||||||||||||||
Q2 2012 | 4,047 | 100.00 | |||||||||||||||
Q3 2012 | 4,091 | 100.00 | |||||||||||||||
Q4 2012 | ? | ? | 4,092 | ? | ? | ? | ? | 100.00 | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? |
Total 2012 | ? | ? | 16,277 | ? | ? | ? | $ | 100.00 | ? | ? | ? | 55,000 | ? | ? | ? | 30 | % |
? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? |
Total 2013 | ? | ? | 21,245 | ? | ? | ? | $ | 95.19 | ? | ? | ? | 74,000 | ? | ? | ? | 29 | % |
Total 2014 | ? | ? | 15,379 | ? | ? | ? | $ | 96.61 | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? |
Total 2015 | ? | ? | 19,360 | ? | ? | ? | $ | 100.57 | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? |
Total 2016 ? 2017 | ? | ? | 24,220 | ? | ? | ? | $ | 100.07 | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? |
Chesapeake Energy Corporation
Investor Contacts:
Jeffrey L.
Mobley, CFA, 405-767-4763
jeff.mobley@chk.com
or
John
J. Kilgallon, 405-935-4441
john.kilgallon@chk.com
or
Media
Contacts:
Michael Kehs, 405-935-2560
michael.kehs@chk.com
or
Jim
Gipson, 405-935-1310
jim.gipson@chk.com





