• Dienstag, 13 Mai 2025
  • 04:07 Frankfurt
  • 03:07 London
  • 22:07 New York
  • 22:07 Toronto
  • 19:07 Vancouver
  • 12:07 Sydney

Chesapeake Energy Corporation Reports Financial and Operational Results for the 2012 Fourth Quarter and Full Year

21.02.2013  |  Business Wire

Company Reports 2012 Fourth Quarter Net Income Available to Common
Stockholders of $257 Million, or $0.39 per Share, Adjusted Net Income
Available to Common Stockholders of $153 Million, or $0.26 per Share,
and Adjusted Ebitda and Operating Cash Flow of $1.1 Billion

2012 Fourth Quarter Production Totals 362 Bcfe for an Average of
3.9 Bcfe per Day, an Increase of 9% Year over Year; 2012 Fourth Quarter
Liquids Production Totals 147,500 Bbls per Day, an Increase of 39% Year
over Year

Company Reports 2012 Year-End Proved Reserves of 15.7 Tcfe; Adds
Proved Reserves of 5.0 Tcfe in 2012


Chesapeake Energy Corporation (NYSE:CHK) today announced financial and
operational results for the 2012 fourth quarter and full year. For the
2012 fourth quarter, Chesapeake reported net income available to common
stockholders of $257 million ($0.39 per fully diluted common share),
ebitda of $1.299 billion (defined as net income (loss) before income
taxes, interest expense and depreciation, depletion and amortization),
operating cash flow of $1.146 billion (defined as cash flow from
operating activities before changes in assets and liabilities) and
production of 362 billion cubic feet of natural gas equivalent (bcfe).
For the 2012 full year, Chesapeake reported a net loss available to
common stockholders of $940 million, or a loss of $1.46 per fully
diluted common share, ebitda of $1.914 billion, operating cash flow of
$4.069 billion and production of 1.422 trillion cubic feet of natural
gas equivalent (tcfe).


The company′s 2012 fourth quarter and full year results include various
items that are generally not included in published estimates of the
company′s financial results by securities analysts. Excluding such
items, Chesapeake reported adjusted net income available to common
stockholders of $153 million, or $0.26 per fully diluted common share,
and adjusted ebitda of $1.089 billion for the 2012 fourth quarter and
adjusted net income available to common stockholders of $285 million, or
$0.61 per fully diluted common share, and adjusted ebitda of $3.754
billion for the 2012 full year. The primary excluded items from the 2012
fourth quarter and full year reported results are the following:


  • a noncash after-tax impairment charge of $2.022 billion for the full
    year related to the carrying value of natural gas and oil properties;

  • an after-tax charge of $122 million related to the full repayment of
    the company′s May 2012 term loans for the fourth quarter and full year;

  • net unrealized noncash after-tax mark-to-market gains of $78 million
    for the fourth quarter and $347 million for the full year resulting
    from the company′s natural gas, oil and natural gas liquids (NGL) and
    interest rate hedging programs;

  • net after-tax gains of $166 million for the fourth quarter and $163
    million for the full year related to gains and losses on sales,
    including a $176 million after-tax gain on the sale of the company′s
    midstream subsidiary for the fourth quarter and full year;

  • noncash after-tax charges of $36 million for the fourth quarter and
    $208 million for the full year related to the impairment of certain
    fixed assets; and

  • net after-tax gains of $19 million for the fourth quarter and $622
    million for the full year related to certain investments, including a
    $629 million gain for the full year related to the sale of all of the
    company′s interests in Access Midstream Partners, L.P. (NYSE:ACMP).


A reconciliation of operating cash flow, ebitda, adjusted ebitda and
adjusted net income to comparable financial measures calculated in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles is provided on
pages 18 - 21 of this release.

Management Comments


Steven C. Dixon, Chesapeake′s Chief Operating Officer, said, 'We
continue to deliver on our liquids growth targets, led by a
year-over-year increase of nearly 40,000 barrels per day in oil
production. We achieved this despite the sale of nearly 18,000 barrels
per day of oil production associated with our exit from the Permian
Basin during the 2012 third and fourth quarters. We believe this
performance ranks Chesapeake among the top three organic oil growth
stories in the industry for 2012. I am very proud of what our team has
accomplished thus far and look forward to driving further liquids
production growth and capital efficiencies in 2013.?


Domenic J. Dell′Osso, Jr., Chesapeake′s Chief Financial Officer, added,
'Chesapeake delivered strong results during the 2012 fourth quarter. I
am pleased to reaffirm our 2013 guidance for liquids production growth
and drilling and completion capital expenditures, while at the same time
reducing our cost guidance for many significant categories.
Additionally, we are reaffirming the commitment of management and the
Board of Directors to reducing financial leverage of the company through
asset sales. I would also like to note we have protected a substantial
portion of our projected operating cash flows in 2013 through downside
hedge protection on approximately 85% of our projected oil production at
an average price of $95.45 per barrel and approximately 50% of our
projected natural gas production at an average price of $3.62 per mcf.
This equates to approximately 72% of our projected 2013 natural gas, oil
and NGL revenue, after differentials.?

Key Operational and Financial Statistics Summarized


The table below summarizes Chesapeake′s key results during the 2012
fourth quarter and compares them to results during the 2012 third
quarter and the 2011 fourth quarter and also compares the 2012 full year
to the 2011 full year.


 ?

 ?

 ?
Three Months EndedFull Year Ended
12/31/12
 ?
9/30/12
 ?
12/31/1112/31/12
 ?
12/31/11

Average daily production (in mmcfe)

3,931

4,142

3,596

3,886

3,272

Natural gas equivalent production (in bcfe)

362

381

331

1,422

1,194

Natural gas equivalent realized price ($/mcfe)(a)

4.23

4.04

5.08

4.02

5.70

Oil production (in mbbls)

8,936

8,996

5,291

31,265

16,964

Average realized oil price ($/bbl)(a)

92.23

90.79

88.02

91.74

86.25

Oil as % of total production

15

14

10

13

9

NGL production (in mbbls)

4,634

4,130

4,476

17,615

14,712

Average realized NGL price ($/bbl)(a)

27.12

31.22

35.87

29.37

38.12

NGL as % of total production

8

7

8

7

7

Liquids as % of total realized revenue(b)

62

61

37

59

30

Liquids as % of unhedged revenue(b)

59

63

47

63

40

Natural gas production (in bcf)

280

302

272

1,129

1,004

Average realized natural gas price ($/mcf)(a)

2.07

1.97

3.87

2.07

4.77

Natural gas as % of total production

77

79

82

80

84

Natural gas as % of realized revenue

38

39

63

41

70

Natural gas as % of unhedged revenue

41

37

53

37

60

Marketing, gathering and compression net margin ($/mcfe)(c)

0.11

0.11

0.07

0.08

0.10

Oilfield services net margin ($/mcfe) (c)(d)

0.05

0.09

0.09

0.10

0.10

Production expenses ($/mcfe)

(0.83

)

(0.84

)

(0.88

)

(0.92

)

(0.90

)

Production taxes ($/mcfe)

(0.13

)

(0.14

)

(0.15

)

(0.13

)

(0.16

)

General and administrative costs ($/mcfe)(e)

(0.23

)

(0.33

)

(0.35

)

(0.33

)

(0.38

)

Stock-based compensation ($/mcfe)

(0.04

)

(0.05

)

(0.06

)

(0.05

)

(0.08

)

DD&A of natural gas and liquids properties ($/mcfe)

(1.80

)

(2.00

)

(1.46

)

(1.76

)

(1.37

)

D&A of other assets ($/mcfe)(f)

(0.20

)

(0.17

)

(0.26

)

(0.21

)

(0.24

)

Interest expense ($/mcfe)(a)

(0.05

)

(0.10

)

(0.04

)

(0.06

)

(0.03

)

Operating cash flow ($ in millions)(g)

1,146

1,118

1,311

4,069

5,309

Operating cash flow ($/mcfe)

3.17

2.93

3.96

2.86

4.45

Adjusted ebitda ($ in millions)(h)

1,089

1,021

1,308

3,754

5,406

Adjusted ebitda ($/mcfe)

3.01

2.68

3.95

2.64

4.53

Net income (loss) to common stockholders ($ in millions)

257

(2,055

)

429

(940

)

1,570

Earnings (loss) per share ? diluted ($)

0.39

(3.19

)

0.63

(1.46

)

2.32

Adjusted net income to common stockholders ($ in millions)(i)

153

35

394

285

1,936

Adjusted earnings per share ? diluted ($)

0.26

0.10

0.58

0.61

2.80

 ?


(a)


Includes the effects of realized gains (losses) from hedging, but
excludes the effects of unrealized gains (losses) from hedging.


(b)


'Liquids? includes both oil and NGL.


(c)


Includes revenue and operating costs and excludes depreciation and
amortization of other assets.


(d)


2012 fourth quarter and full year include impact of certain
consolidated investments along with results from Chesapeake
Oilfield Services.


(e)


Excludes expenses associated with noncash stock-based compensation.


(f)


The decrease from 2011 to 2012 (year over year and quarter over
quarter) is due to assets being classified as held for sale as of
June 30, 2012 and not subject to depreciation thereafter. The
assets were sold as part of the midstream sale to ACMP in December
2012.


(g)


Defined as cash flow provided by operating activities before
changes in assets and liabilities.


(h)


Defined as net income (loss) before income taxes, interest
expense, and depreciation, depletion and amortization expense, as
adjusted to remove the effects of certain items detailed on page
20.


(i)


Defined as net income (loss) available to common stockholders, as
adjusted to remove the effects of certain items detailed on page
21.


 ?

Hedging Positions Detailed


The following table summarizes Chesapeake′s downside hedge position
through swaps and collars on its 2013 natural gas and oil production as
of February 20, 2013. The company does not currently have hedges in
place for its NGL production. Depending on changes in natural gas and
oil futures markets and management′s view of underlying supply and
demand trends, Chesapeake may increase or decrease some or all of its
hedging positions at any time in the future without notice.


 ?

 ?
Natural GasOil
Year

% of Forecasted

Production


 ?

NYMEX

Natural Gas

% of Forecasted

Production


 ?
NYMEX

Oil WTI


2013

50%

 ?

$3.62

85%

 ?

$95.45

 ?


Details of the company′s year-end hedging positions will be provided in
the company′s Form 10-K filing with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (SEC), and current positions are disclosed in summary format
in management′s Outlook dated February 21, 2013, which is attached to
this release as Schedule 'A,? beginning on page 22. The Outlook has been
updated from the Outlook dated November 1, 2012, attached as Schedule
'B,? which begins on page 25, to reflect various updated information.

2012 Fourth Quarter Average Daily Liquids Production Increases 39%
Year over Year


and 3% Sequentially to 147,500 Bbls; 2012
Fourth Quarter Average Daily Oil


Production Increases 69%
Year over Year and Was Flat Sequentially


at 97,100 Bbls,
Primarily as a Result of Asset Sales


Chesapeake′s daily production for the 2012 fourth quarter averaged 3.931
bcfe, an increase of 9% from the average 3.596 bcfe produced per day in
the 2011 fourth quarter and a decrease of 5% from the average 4.142 bcfe
produced per day in the 2012 third quarter. The decrease was primarily
the result of selling approximately 0.220 bcfe per day of production
associated with the company′s Permian Basin producing assets in
September and October of 2012. Chesapeake′s average daily production of
3.931 bcfe for the 2012 fourth quarter consisted of approximately 3.046
billion cubic feet (bcf) of natural gas (77% on a natural gas equivalent
basis) and approximately 147,500 barrels (bbls) of liquids, consisting
of approximately 97,100 bbls of oil (15% on a natural gas equivalent
basis) and approximately 50,400 bbls of NGL (8% on a natural gas
equivalent basis) (oil and NGL collectively referred to as 'liquids?).


For the 2012 fourth quarter, the company′s year-over-year growth rate of
natural gas production was 3%, or approximately 87 million cubic feet
(mmcf) per day, and its year-over-year growth rate of liquids production
was 39%, or approximately 41,300 bbls per day. Chesapeake′s
year-over-year liquids production growth consisted of oil production
growth of 69%, or approximately 39,600 bbls per day, and NGL production
growth of 4%, or approximately 1,700 bbls per day.


Chesapeake′s daily production for the 2012 full year averaged 3.886
bcfe, a 19% increase from the average 3.272 bcfe produced per day for
the 2011 full year. The company′s average daily production of 3.886 bcfe
for the 2012 full year consisted of approximately 3.084 bcf of natural
gas (80% on a natural gas equivalent basis) and approximately 133,550
bbls of liquids, consisting of approximately 85,420 bbls of oil (13% on
a natural gas equivalent basis) and approximately 48,130 bbls of NGL (7%
on a natural gas equivalent basis).


For the 2012 full year, the company′s year-over-year growth rate of
natural gas production was 12%, or approximately 333 bcf per day, and
its year-over-year growth rate of liquids production was 54%, or
approximately 46,770 bbls per day. Chesapeake′s year-over-year liquids
production growth consisted of oil production growth of 84%, or
approximately 38,950 bbls per day, and NGL production growth of 19%, or
approximately 7,820 bbls per day.


As a result of completed and planned asset sales and the continued shift
in focus in its drilling program from dry gas plays to liquids-rich
plays, Chesapeake is projecting its natural gas production to decline
approximately 7% in 2013 and is projecting its liquids production to
increase approximately 27% in 2013.

During 2012, Company Adds New Net Proved Reserves of 5.0 Tcfe, or 840
Mmboe, through the Drillbit; Total Proved Reserves Decrease 17% to 15.7
Tcfe, or 2.6 Bboe, Primarily Due to Downward Price-Related Revisions and
Net Divestitures


The company's December 31, 2012 estimated proved reserves were 15.690
tcfe, or 2.6 billion barrels of oil equivalent (bboe), a 17% decrease
from year-end 2011. Chesapeake added 5.042 tcfe, or 840 million barrels
of oil equivalent (mmboe), of new proved reserves (net of 1.349 tcfe, or
225 mmboe of nonprice-related revisions) through the drillbit at a
drilling and completion cost of $1.82 per thousand cubic feet of natural
gas equivalent (mcfe), or $10.92 per barrel of oil equivalent (boe),
during 2012.


Primarily as a result of lower natural gas prices, the company recorded
downward price-related revisions of 5.414 tcfe, or 902 mmboe, during
2012. These price revisions were seen primarily with the removal of
proved undeveloped reserves (PUDs) in the company′s Barnett and
Haynesville shale plays. The majority of the downward nonprice-related
revisions of 1.349 tcfe resulted from the continued execution of the
company′s strategy to shift its drilling focus from natural gas to
liquids-rich areas and to drill in the 'core of the core? of its acreage
positions. As rigs were reallocated, PUDs were removed from various
non-core areas resulting in downward revisions. Additionally, during
2012, Chesapeake recorded net divestitures of 1.305 tcfe, or 218 mmboe.


The following table presents Chesapeake′s December 31, 2012 estimated
proved reserves, estimated future net cash flows from proved reserves
(discounted at an annual rate of 10% before income taxes (PV-10)) and
proved developed percentage, each calculated based on the trailing
12-month average price required under SEC rules and the 10-year average
NYMEX strip prices as of December 31, 2012. Additional information
regarding the SEC case can be found on page 14.


 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

Pricing Method


 ?

Natural Gas Price

($/mcf)


 ?


 ?

Oil Price

($/bbl)


 ?
Proved

Reserves

(tcfe)


 ?

PV-10

(billions)


 ?
Proved

Developed

Percentage


Trailing 12-month avg (SEC)(a)

$2.76

$94.84

15.7

$17.8

57%

12/31/12 avg NYMEX strip(b)

$4.85

$87.90

19.6

$27.9

55%

 ?


a) Reserve volumes estimated using SEC reserve recognition
standards and pricing assumptions based on the trailing 12-month
average first-day-of-the-month prices as of December 31, 2012.
This pricing assumption yields estimated proved reserves for SEC
reporting purposes.


b) Natural gas and oil volumes estimated under the 10-year average
NYMEX strip reflect an alternative pricing scenario that
illustrates the sensitivity of proved reserves to a different
pricing assumption. Futures prices represent an unbiased consensus
estimate by market participants about the likely prices to be
received for future production. Management believes that 10-year
average NYMEX strip prices provide a better indicator of the
likely economic producibility of the company′s proved reserves
than the historical 12-month average price.


 ?

Operational Update; Eagle Ford Production Grows 266%

Year
Over Year and 20% Sequentially


Since 2000, Chesapeake has built a leading position in 10 of what it
believes are the Top 15 unconventional plays in the U.S. ? the Eagle
Ford Shale in South Texas; the Marcellus Shale in Pennsylvania and West
Virginia; the Utica Shale in Ohio, West Virginia and Pennsylvania; the
Granite Wash, Cleveland, Tonkawa and Mississippi Lime plays in the
Anadarko Basin in Oklahoma and the Texas Panhandle; the
Haynesville/Bossier shales in western Louisiana and East Texas; the
Barnett Shale in North Texas; and the Niobrara Shale in the Powder River
Basin in Wyoming. These 10 plays represent Chesapeake′s core assets and
are the nearly exclusive focus of the company′s planned future drilling
efforts.


During the past four years, Chesapeake has substantially shifted its
drilling and completion activity to liquids-rich plays in response to
strong U.S. oil prices and relatively weak U.S. natural gas prices.
During 2012, the company invested approximately 84% of its operated
drilling and completion capital expenditures in liquids-rich plays and
projects approximately 86% of such expenditures will be invested in
liquids-rich plays in 2013.


The company continues to achieve strong operational results in its
liquids-rich plays, as highlighted below:

Eagle Ford Shale (South Texas):Chesapeake continues to generate impressive liquids production
growth rates from its 485,000 net acres of leasehold in the Eagle Ford
Shale in South Texas. Net production during the 2012 fourth quarter
averaged 62,500 boe per day (143,200 gross operated boe per day). This
represents an increase of 266% year over year and 20% sequentially.
Approximately 66% of total Eagle Ford production during the 2012 fourth
quarter was oil, 15% was NGL and 19% was natural gas.


As of December 31, 2012, Chesapeake had 534 gross operated producing
wells in the Eagle Ford, of which 405 reached first production in 2012,
including 98 in the fourth quarter. The company is currently operating
17 rigs in the play, down from a peak of 34 rigs in April 2012, and
plans to operate an average of 16 rigs in 2013. Spud-to-spud cycle times
have declined dramatically in the Eagle Ford, from 26 days in the 2011
fourth quarter to only 18 days in the 2012 fourth quarter. Chesapeake
plans to drill fewer Eagle Ford wells in 2013 than in 2012; however, the
planned number of wells turned-to-sales will be roughly equal in both
years. The company remains on pace to have substantially all of its core
and Tier 1 Eagle Ford acreage held by production by the end of 2013.


Of the 98 wells that commenced first production in the 2012 fourth
quarter, 90 wells (or 92%) had peak production rates of more than 500
boe per day, including 27 wells (or 28%) with peak rates of more than
1,000 boe per day.


Three notable wells completed by Chesapeake in the Eagle Ford during the
2012 fourth quarter are as follows:


  • The Hahn Dew 1H in DeWitt County, TX achieved a peak rate of
    approximately 1,985 boe per day, which included 550 bbls of oil, 360
    bbls of NGL and 6.4 mmcf of natural gas per day;

  • The Flat Creek Unit A Dim 2H in Dimmit County, TX achieved a
    peak rate of approximately 1,470 boe per day, which included 1,210
    bbls of oil, 160 bbls of NGL and 0.6 mmcf of natural gas per day; and

  • The JJ Henry IX M 1H in McMullen County, TX achieved a peak
    rate of approximately 1,275 boe per day, which included 1,160 bbls of
    oil, 55 bbls of NGL and 0.4 mmcf of natural gas per day.


As part of its 'core of the core? strategy, Chesapeake is currently
pursuing the sale of a portion of its existing northern Eagle Ford Shale
leasehold and producing assets which are outside its core development
area.

Utica Shale (eastern Ohio, Pennsylvania, West
Virginia)
:Chesapeake continues to focus on
developing the core wet gas window of the Utica Shale in eastern Ohio, a
play in which the company holds the industry′s largest position,
approximately 1.0 million net acres of leasehold. As of December 31,
2012, Chesapeake has drilled a total of 184 wells in the Utica, which
includes 45 producing wells, 47 additional wells waiting on pipeline
connection and 92 wells in various stages of completion. Chesapeake is
currently operating 14 rigs in the Utica and plans to average 14
operated rigs during 2013. Production growth from the Utica is expected
to accelerate during 2013 when two new third-party natural gas
processing complexes will enable the company to turn a large portion of
its well inventory to sales.


Three notable wells completed by Chesapeake in the Utica during the 2012
fourth quarter are as follows:


  • The Houyouse 15-13-5 1H in Carroll County, OH achieved a peak
    rate of approximately 1,730 boe per day, which included 525 bbls of
    oil, 305 bbls of NGL and 5.4 mmcf of natural gas per day;

  • The Cain South 16-12-4 8H in Jefferson County, OH achieved a
    peak rate of approximately 1,540 boe per day, which included 425 bbls
    of NGL and 6.7 mmcf of natural gas per day; and

  • The Walters 30-12-5 8H in Carroll County, OH achieved a peak
    rate of approximately 1,140 boe per day, which included 315 bbls of
    oil, 220 bbls of NGL and 3.6 mmcf of natural gas per day.


As of December 31, 2012, the company′s remaining drilling and completion
carry from Total E&P USA, Inc. was approximately $1.15 billion.
Chesapeake anticipates using 100% of the remaining carry by year-end
2014, and the carry will pay for 60% of Chesapeake′s drilling and
completion costs during that time.

Marcellus Shale (Pennsylvania, West Virginia):With approximately 1.8 million net acres, Chesapeake is the
industry′s largest leasehold owner in the Marcellus Shale, which spans
from northern West Virginia across much of Pennsylvania into southern
New York.


During the 2012 fourth quarter, Chesapeake′s average daily net
production in the northern dry gas portion of the Marcellus was 645
million cubic feet of natural gas equivalent (mmcfe) per day (1,485
gross operated mmcfe per day), an increase of 135% year over year and
19% sequentially. Chesapeake has reduced its operated rig count to five
rigs in the northern dry gas portion of the Marcellus and anticipates
maintaining that level of activity for the remainder of 2013.


Three notable wells completed by Chesapeake in the northern dry gas
portion of the Marcellus during the 2012 fourth quarter are as follows:


  • The Holtan 5H in Susquehanna County, PA achieved a peak rate of
    12.6 mmcf of natural gas per day;

  • The Lopatofsky 2H in Wyoming County, PA achieved a peak rate of
    11.4 mmcf of natural gas per day; and

  • The Messersmith S Bra 1H in Bradford County, PA achieved a peak
    rate of 10.5 mmcf of natural gas per day.


During the 2012 fourth quarter, Chesapeake′s average daily net
production in the southern wet gas portion of the play was approximately
155 mmcfe per day (260 gross operated mmcfe per day). Management expects
production from the southern Marcellus will remain relatively flat until
the ATEX pipeline, which will carry processed ethane to the Gulf Coast,
comes online in late 2013. Chesapeake is currently drilling with three
operated rigs in the southern wet gas portion of the Marcellus and
anticipates maintaining that level of activity for the remainder of 2013.


Three notable wells completed by Chesapeake in the southern wet gas
portion of the Marcellus during the 2012 fourth quarter are as follows:


  • The Mark Hickman 5H in Ohio County, WV achieved an initial test
    rate of approximately 1,195 boe per day, which included 290 bbls of
    oil, 305 bbls of NGL and 3.6 mmcf of natural gas per day;

  • The Esther Weeks 1H in Ohio County, WV achieved an initial test
    rate of approximately 1,000 boe per day, which included 195 bbls of
    oil, 265 bbls of NGL and 3.3 mmcf of natural gas per day; and

  • The Michael Southworth 8H in Marshall County, WV achieved an
    initial test rate of approximately 955 boe per day, which included 305
    bbls of oil, 215 bbls of NGL and 2.6 mmcf of natural gas per day.


The company is in the process of selling various non-core Marcellus
acreage.

Mississippi Lime (northern Oklahoma, southern
Kansas)
: Chesapeake′s approximate 2.1 million net
acres of leasehold is the industry′s largest position in the Mississippi
Lime play in northern Oklahoma and southern Kansas. Production for the
2012 fourth quarter averaged approximately 32,500 boe per day (41,600
gross operated boe per day), up 208% year over year and 30%
sequentially. Approximately 45% of total Mississippi Lime production
during the 2012 fourth quarter was oil, 9% was NGL and 46% was natural
gas. As of December 31, 2012, Chesapeake had 273 producing wells in the
Mississippi Lime play, which included 55 wells that reached first
production in the 2012 fourth quarter, compared to 73 in the 2012 third
quarter and 49 in the 2012 second quarter. Also, as of December 31,
2012, Chesapeake had approximately 46 wells drilled, but not yet
producing, that were in various stages of completion and/or waiting on
pipeline connection. Chesapeake is currently operating eight rigs in the
Mississippi Lime and anticipates maintaining that level of activity for
the remainder of 2013.


Three notable wells completed by Chesapeake in the Mississippi Lime
during the 2012 fourth quarter are as follows:


  • The Mike 2-28-15 1H in Woods County, OK achieved a peak rate of
    approximately 2,820 boe per day, which included 2,345 bbls of oil, 100
    bbls of NGL and 2.3 mmcf of natural gas per day;

  • The Roper 1-28-15 1H in Woods County, OK achieved a peak rate
    of approximately 1,985 boe per day, which included 1,645 bbls of oil,
    70 bbls of NGL and 1.6 mmcf of natural gas per day; and

  • The Thorp 4-24-10 1H in Alfalfa County, OK achieved a peak rate
    of approximately 1,365 boe per day, which included 465 bbls of oil,
    215 bbls of NGL and 4.1 mmcf of natural gas per day.

2012 Fourth Quarter and Full Year Financial and Operational Results

Conference
Call Information


A conference call to discuss this release has been scheduled for
Thursday, February 21, 2013 at 9:00 am EST. The telephone number to
access the conference call is 913-981-5550 or toll-free 800-289-0508.
The passcode for the call is 8878841. We encourage those who
would like to participate in the call to place calls between 8:50 and
9:00 am EST. For those unable to participate in the conference call, a
replay will be available for audio playback at 1:00 pm EST on Thursday,
February 21, 2013 and will run through midnight Thursday, March 7, 2013.
The number to access the conference call replay is 719-457-0820
or toll-free 888-203-1112. The passcode for the replay is 8878841.
The conference call will also be webcast live on Chesapeake′s website at www.chk.com
in the 'Events? subsection of the 'Investors? section of the company′s
website. The webcast of the conference will be available on the
company′s website for one year.

This news release and the accompanying Outlooks include
'forward-looking statements? within the meaning of Section ?27A of the
Securities Act of 1933 and Section ?21E of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934.
Forward-looking statements are statements other than
statements of historical fact that give our current expectations or
forecasts of future events.
They include estimates of natural gas
and liquids reserves, projected production, estimates of operating
costs, planned development drilling and use of joint venture drilling
carries, anticipated asset sales, projected cash flow and liquidity,
business strategy and other plans and objectives for future operations.
Disclosures concerning the estimated contribution of derivative
contracts to our future results of operations are based upon market
information as of a specific date.
These market prices are
subject to significant volatility.
We caution you not to place
undue reliance on our forward-looking statements, which speak only as of
the date of this news release, and we undertake no obligation to update
this information.

Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from
expected results are described under 'Risk Factors? in Item 1A of our
2011 annual report on Form 10-K filed with the U.S. Securities and
Exchange Commission on February ?29, 2012.
These risk factors
include the volatility of natural gas and oil prices; the limitations
our level of indebtedness may have on our financial flexibility;
declines in the values of our natural gas and oil properties resulting
in ceiling test write-downs; the availability of capital on an economic
basis, including through planned asset sales, to fund reserve
replacement costs; our ability to replace reserves and sustain
production; uncertainties inherent in estimating quantities of natural
gas and oil reserves and projecting future rates of production and the
amount and timing of development expenditures; inability to generate
profits or achieve targeted results in drilling and well operations;
leasehold terms expiring before production can be established; hedging
activities resulting in lower prices realized on natural gas and oil
sales; the need to secure hedging liabilities and the inability of
hedging counterparties to satisfy their obligations; drilling and
operating risks, including potential environmental liabilities;
legislative and regulatory changes adversely affecting our industry and
our business, including initiatives related to hydraulic fracturing;
general economic conditions negatively impacting us and our business
counterparties; oilfield services shortages and transportation capacity
constraints and interruptions that could adversely affect our cash flow;
and losses possible from pending or future litigation and regulatory
investigations.
We do not have binding agreements for all of our
planned 2013 asset sales. Our ability to consummate each of these
transactions is subject to changes in market conditions and other
factors. If one or more of the transactions is not completed in the
anticipated time frame or at all or for less proceeds than anticipated,
our ability to fund budgeted capital expenditures and reduce our
indebtedness as planned could be adversely affected.

Our production forecasts are dependent upon many assumptions,
including estimates of production decline rates from existing wells and
the outcome of future drilling activity.
Although we believe the
expectations and forecasts reflected in these and other forward-looking
statements are reasonable, we can give no assurance they will prove to
have been correct.
They can be affected by inaccurate assumptions
or by known or unknown risks and uncertainties.

Chesapeake Energy Corporation (NYSE:CHK) is the second-largest
producer of natural gas, a Top 11 producer of oil and natural gas
liquids and the most active driller of new wells in the U.S.
Headquartered in Oklahoma City, the company's operations are focused on
discovering and developing unconventional natural gas and oil fields
onshore in the U.S. Chesapeake owns leading positions in the Eagle Ford,
Utica, Granite Wash, Cleveland, Tonkawa, Mississippi Lime and Niobrara
unconventional liquids plays and in the Marcellus, Haynesville/Bossier
and Barnett unconventional natural gas shale plays. The company has also
vertically integrated its operations and owns substantial marketing and
oilfield services businesses through its subsidiaries Chesapeake Energy
Marketing, Inc. and Chesapeake Oilfield Operating, L.L.C.
Further
information is available at
www.chk.com
where Chesapeake routinely posts announcements, updates, events,
investor information, presentations and news releases.


 ?

 ?


 ?

CHESAPEAKE ENERGY CORPORATION

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

($ in millions, except per-share and unit data)

(unaudited)


 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?
December 31,December 31,
THREE MONTHS ENDED:
 ?
2012
 ?

 ?
2011
$
 ?
$/mcfe$
 ?
$/mcfe
REVENUES:
 ?

 ?
Natural gas, oil and NGL
1,657

4.58

1,336

4.03
Marketing, gathering and compression
1,721

4.76

1,246

3.77
Oilfield services
 ?

161

 ?

0.45

 ?

145

 ?

0.44
Total Revenues
 ?

3,539

 ?

9.79

 ?

2,727

 ?

8.24

 ?
OPERATING EXPENSES:
Natural gas, oil and NGL production
299

0.83

292

0.88
Production taxes
47

0.13

51

0.15
Marketing, gathering and compression
1,681

4.65

1,223

3.70
Oilfield services
145

0.40

115

0.35
General and administrative
99

0.27

138

0.42
Employee retirement expense and other termination benefits
3

0.01

?

?
Natural gas, oil and NGL depreciation, depletion and

amortization


651

1.80

484

1.46
Depreciation and amortization of other assets
71

0.20

85

0.26
Net gains on sales of fixed assets
(272

)

(0.75

)

(439

)

(1.33

)
Impairments of fixed assets and other
 ?

59

 ?

0.16

 ?

42

 ?

0.13
Total Operating Expenses
 ?

2,783

 ?

7.70

 ?

1,991

 ?

6.02

 ?
INCOME (LOSS) FROM OPERATIONS
 ?

756

 ?

2.09

 ?

736

 ?

2.22

 ?
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE):
Interest expense
(14

)

(0.04

)

(7

)

(0.02

)
Earnings (losses) on investments
(16

)

(0.04

)

56

0.17
Gain on sale of investment
31

0.09

?

?
Losses on purchases of debt
(200

)

(0.55

)

?

?
Other income
 ?

6

 ?

0.01

 ?

14

 ?

0.04
Total Other Income (Expense)
 ?

(193

)

 ?

(0.53

)

 ?

63

 ?

0.19

 ?
INCOME (LOSS) BEFORE INCOME TAXES
563

1.56

799

2.41

 ?
INCOME TAX EXPENSE (BENEFIT):
Current income taxes
23

0.06

2

?
Deferred income taxes
 ?

196

 ?

0.55

 ?

310

 ?

0.94
Total Income Tax Expense (Benefit)
 ?

219

 ?

0.61

 ?

312

 ?

0.94

 ?
NET INCOME (LOSS)
344

0.95

487

1.47

 ?
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
 ?

(44

)

 ?

(0.12

)

 ?

(15

)

 ?

(0.04

)

 ?
NET INCOME (LOSS) ATTRIBUTABLE TO CHESAPEAKE
 ?

300

 ?

0.83

 ?

472

 ?

1.43

 ?
Preferred stock dividends
 ?

(43

)

 ?

(0.12

)

 ?

(43

)

 ?

(0.13

)

 ?

NET INCOME (LOSS) AVAILABLE TO COMMON STOCKHOLDERS


 ?

257

 ?

0.71

 ?

429

 ?

1.30

 ?
EARNINGS (LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE:
Basic
$

0.39

$

0.67

 ?
Diluted
$

0.39

$

0.63

 ?
WEIGHTED AVERAGE COMMON AND COMMON

EQUIVALENT SHARES OUTSTANDING (in millions):

Basic
 ?

644

 ?

640

 ?
Diluted
 ?

648

 ?

750

 ?

 ?

CHESAPEAKE ENERGY CORPORATION

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

($ in millions, except per-share and unit data)

(unaudited)


 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?
December 31,December 31,
TWELVE MONTHS ENDED:
 ?
2012
 ?

 ?
2011
$
 ?
$/mcfe$
 ?
$/mcfe
REVENUES:
 ?

 ?
Natural gas, oil and NGL
6,278

4.42

6,024

5.04
Marketing, gathering and compression
5,431

3.81

5,090

4.26
Oilfield services
 ?

607

 ?

0.43

 ?

521

 ?

0.44
Total Revenues
 ?

12,316

 ?

8.66

 ?

11,635

 ?

9.74

 ?
OPERATING EXPENSES:
Natural gas, oil and NGL production
1,304

0.92

1,073

0.90
Production taxes
188

0.13

192

0.16
Marketing, gathering and compression
5,312

3.73

4,967

4.16
Oilfield services
465

0.33

402

0.34
General and administrative
535

0.38

548

0.46
Employee retirement expense and other termination benefits
7

0.01

?

?

Natural gas, oil and NGL depreciation, depletion and
amortization


2,507

1.76

1,632

1.37
Depreciation and amortization of other assets
304

0.21

291

0.24
Impairment of natural gas and oil properties
3,315

2.33

?

?
Net gains on sales of fixed assets
(267

)

(0.18

)

(437

)

(0.37

)
Impairments of fixed assets and other
 ?

340

 ?

0.24

 ?

46

 ?

0.03
Total Operating Expenses
 ?

14,010

 ?

9.86

 ?

8,714

 ?

7.29

 ?
INCOME (LOSS) FROM OPERATIONS
 ?

(1,694

)

 ?

(1.20

)

 ?

2,921

 ?

2.45

 ?
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE):
Interest expense
(77

)

(0.05

)

(44

)

(0.04

)
Earnings (losses) on investments
(103

)

(0.08

)

156

0.13
Gain on sales of investments
1,092

0.77

?

?
Losses on purchases of debt
(200

)

(0.14

)

(176

)

(0.15

)
Other income
 ?

8

 ?

0.01

 ?

23

 ?

0.02
Total Other Income (Expense)
 ?

720

 ?

0.51

 ?

(41

)

 ?

(0.04

)

 ?
INCOME (LOSS) BEFORE INCOME TAXES
(974

)

(0.69

)

2,880

2.41

 ?
INCOME TAX EXPENSE (BENEFIT):
Current income taxes
47

0.03

13

0.01
Deferred income taxes
 ?

(427

)

 ?

(0.30

)

 ?

1,110

 ?

0.93
Total Income Tax Expense (Benefit)
 ?

(380

)

 ?

(0.27

)

 ?

1,123

 ?

0.94

 ?
NET INCOME (LOSS)
(594

)

(0.42

)

1,757

1.47

 ?
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
 ?

(175

)

 ?

(0.12

)

 ?

(15

)

 ?

(0.01

)

 ?
NET INCOME (LOSS) ATTRIBUTABLE TO CHESAPEAKE
 ?

(769

)

 ?

(0.54

)

 ?

1,742

 ?

1.46

 ?
Preferred stock dividends
 ?

(171

)

 ?

(0.12

)

 ?

(172

)

 ?

(0.15

)

 ?

NET INCOME (LOSS) AVAILABLE TO COMMON STOCKHOLDERS


 ?

(940

)

 ?

(0.66

)

 ?

1,570

 ?

1.31

 ?
EARNINGS (LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE:
Basic
$

(1.46

)

$

2.47

 ?
Diluted
$

(1.46

)

$

2.32

 ?

WEIGHTED AVERAGE COMMON AND COMMON EQUIVALENT SHARES
OUTSTANDING (in millions):

Basic
 ?

643

 ?

637

 ?
Diluted
 ?

643

 ?

752

 ?

 ?

 ?

CHESAPEAKE ENERGY CORPORATION

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

($ in millions)

(unaudited)


 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?
December 31,December 31,

 ?

 ?
2012
 ?

 ?
2011

 ?
Cash and cash equivalents
$

287

$

351
Other current assets
 ?

2,661

 ?

2,826
Total Current Assets
 ?

2,948

 ?

3,177

 ?
Property and equipment (net)
37,167

36,739
Other assets
 ?

1,496

 ?

1,919
Total Assets
$

41,611

$

41,835

 ?
Current liabilities
$

6,266

$

7,082
Long-term debt, net of discounts
12,157

10,626
Other long-term liabilities
2,485

2,682
Deferred income tax liabilities
 ?

2,807

 ?

3,484
Total Liabilities
 ?

23,715

 ?

23,874

 ?
Chesapeake stockholders' equity
15,569

16,624
Noncontrolling interests
 ?

2,327

 ?

1,337
Total Equity
 ?

17,896

 ?

17,961

 ?
Total Liabilities and Equity
$

41,611

$

41,835

 ?
Common Shares Outstanding (in millions)
 ?

664

 ?

659

 ?

 ?

CHESAPEAKE ENERGY CORPORATION

CAPITALIZATION

($ in millions)

(unaudited)


 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?
December 31,December 31,

 ?

 ?
2012
 ?
2011

 ?
Total debt, net of unrestricted cash
 ?

$

12,333

 ?

$

10,275
Chesapeake stockholders' equity
15,569

16,624
Noncontrolling interests(a)
 ?

2,327

 ?

1,337
Total
$

30,229

$

28,236

 ?
Debt to capitalization ratio
41%

36%

 ?


(a) Includes third-party ownership as follows:


CHK Cleveland Tonkawa, L.L.C.

$

1,015

$

?

CHK Utica, L.L.C.

950

950

Chesapeake Granite Wash Trust

356

380

Other

 ?

6

 ?

7

Total

$

2,327

$

1,337

 ?

CHESAPEAKE ENERGY CORPORATION

RECONCILIATION OF 2012 CHANGES TO NATURAL GAS AND OIL PROPERTIES

BASED ON SEC PRICING OF TRAILING 12-MONTH AVERAGE PRICES AS OF
DECEMBER 31, 2012

($ in millions, except per-unit data)

(unaudited)


 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?
Proved Reserves
Cost
 ?
Bcfe(a)
 ?
$/Mcfe
PROVED PROPERTIES:
 ?

 ?
Well costs on proved properties(b)(c)
$

9,168

5,042
(d)
1.82
Acquisition of proved properties(e)
332

42

7.91
Sale of proved properties
 ?

(2,462

)

 ?

(1,347

)

1.83
Total net proved properties
 ?

7,038

 ?

3,737

1.88

 ?
Revisions ? price
?

(5,414

)

?

 ?
UNPROVED PROPERTIES:
Well costs on unproved properties(f)
(337

)

?

?
Acquisition of unproved properties, net(g)
1,718

?

?
Acquisition of minerals
68

?

?
Sale of unproved properties
 ?

(3,146

)

 ?

?

?
Total net unproved properties
 ?

(1,697

)

 ?

?

?

 ?
OTHER:
Capitalized interest on unproved properties
976

?

?
Geological and geophysical costs
170

?

?
Asset retirement obligations
 ?

32

 ?

?

?
Total other
 ?

1,178

 ?

?

?

 ?
Total
$

6,519

 ?

(1,677

)

?

 ?

CHESAPEAKE ENERGY CORPORATION

ROLL-FORWARD OF PROVED RESERVES

TWELVE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2012

BASED ON SEC PRICING OF TRAILING 12-MONTH AVERAGE PRICES AS OF
DECEMBER 31, 2012

(unaudited)


 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?
Bcfe(a)
 ?

 ?
Beginning balance, January 1, 2012
18,789
Production
(1,422

)
Acquisitions
42
Divestitures
(1,347

)
Revisions ? changes to previous estimates
(1,349

)
Revisions ? price
(5,414

)
Extensions and discoveries
6,391
Ending balance, December 31, 2012
15,690

 ?
Proved reserves decline rate before acquisitions and divestitures
10

%
Proved reserves decline rate after acquisitions and divestitures
17

%

 ?
Proved developed reserves
8,944
Proved developed reserves percentage
57

%

 ?
PV-10 ($ in billions)(a)
$

17.8

 ?


(a) Reserve volumes and PV-10 value estimated using SEC reserve
recognition standards and pricing assumptions based on the
trailing 12-month average first-day-of-the-month prices as of
December 31, 2012 of $2.76 per mcf of natural gas and $94.84 per
bbl of oil, before field differential adjustments.


 ?


(b) Net of well cost carries of $784 million associated with the
Statoil-Marcellus, CNOOC-Eagle Ford, CNOOC-Niobrara and
Total-Utica joint ventures.


 ?


(c) Includes $1.389 billion of well costs incurred in prior
quarters (previously classified as well costs on unproved
properties) related to wells that were evaluated for the existence
of proved reserves in the current quarter.


 ?


(d) Includes 1.349 tcfe of downward revisions resulting from
changes to previous estimates and excludes downward revisions of
5.414 tcfe primarily resulting from lower natural gas prices using
the average first-day-of-the-month price for the twelve months
ended December 31, 2012, compared to the twelve months ended
December 31, 2011.


 ?


(e) Includes 28 bcfe of proved reserves associated with the
company′s Permian Basin volumetric production payment repurchased
by the company for $313 million and subsequently resold to
multiple parties in September and October 2012.


 ?


(f) Includes $1.052 million of well costs on unproved properties
incurred in the current year, offset by the transfer of $1.389
billion previously classified as well costs on unproved properties
that were evaluated for the existence of proved reserves in the
current quarter. See footnote (c).


 ?


(g) Net of joint venture partner reimbursements.


 ?

 ?

 ?

CHESAPEAKE ENERGY CORPORATION

RECONCILIATION OF PV-10

($ in millions)

(unaudited)


 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?
December 31,December 31,

 ?

 ?
2012
 ?

 ?
2011

 ?
Standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows
$

14,666

$

15,630

 ?
Discounted future cash flows for income taxes
 ?

3,107

 ?

4,247

 ?
Discounted future net cash flows before income taxes (PV-10)
$

17,773

$

19,877

 ?


PV-10 is discounted (at 10% per year) future net cash flows before
income taxes. The standardized measure of discounted future net cash
flows includes the effects of estimated future income tax expenses and
is calculated in accordance with Accounting Standards Topic 932.
Management uses PV-10 as one measure of the value of the company's
current proved reserves and to compare relative values among peer
companies without regard to income taxes. The company also understands
that securities analysts and rating agencies use this measure in similar
ways. While PV-10 is based on prices, costs and discount factors which
are consistent from company to company, the standardized measure is
dependent on the unique tax situation of each individual company.


The company′s PV-10 and standardized measure were calculated using
trailing 12-month average first-day-of-the-month prices. As of December
31, 2012 and 2011, the prices used were $2.76 per mcf and $94.84 per bbl
and $4.12 per mcf and $95.97 per bbl, respectively, before field
differential adjustments.


 ?

 ?

CHESAPEAKE ENERGY CORPORATION

SUPPLEMENTAL DATA ? NATURAL GAS, OIL AND NGL SALES AND INTEREST
EXPENSE

(unaudited)


 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?
Three Months EndedTwelve Months Ended
December 31,December 31,
2012
 ?
20112012
 ?
2011
Natural Gas, Oil and NGL Sales ($ in millions):

Natural gas sales

$

645

$

720

$

2,004

$

3,133

Natural gas derivatives ? realized gains (losses)

(63

)

335

328

1,656

Natural gas derivatives ? unrealized gains (losses)

 ?

70

 ?

24

 ?

(331

)

 ?

(669

)

 ?

Total Natural Gas Sales

 ?

652

 ?

1,079

 ?

2,001

 ?

4,120

 ?

Oil sales

790

475

2,829

1,523

Oil derivatives ? realized gains (losses)

34

(10

)

39

(60

)

Oil derivatives ? unrealized gains (losses)

 ?

54

 ?

(375

)

 ?

857

 ?

(128

)

 ?

Total Oil Sales

 ?

878

 ?

90

 ?

3,725

 ?

1,335

 ?

NGL sales

126

171

526

603

NGL derivatives ? realized gains (losses)

?

(10

)

(9

)

(42

)

NGL derivatives ? unrealized gains (losses)

 ?

1

 ?

6

 ?

35

 ?

8

 ?

Total NGL Sales

 ?

127

 ?

167

 ?

552

 ?

569

 ?

Total Natural Gas, Oil and NGL Sales

$

1,657

$

1,336

$

6,278

$

6,024

 ?
Average Sales Price ?

excluding gains (losses) on derivatives:


Natural gas ($ per mcf)

$

2.30

$

2.64

$

1.77

$

3.12

Oil ($ per bbl)

$

88.44

$

89.85

$

90.49

$

89.80

NGL ($ per bbl)

$

27.20

$

38.19

$

29.89

$

40.96

Natural gas equivalent ($ per mcfe)

$

4.32

$

4.13

$

3.77

$

4.40

 ?
Average Sales Price ?

excluding unrealized gains (losses) on derivatives:


Natural gas ($ per mcf)

$

2.07

$

3.87

$

2.07

$

4.77

Oil ($ per bbl)

$

92.23

$

88.02

$

91.74

$

86.25

NGL ($ per bbl)

$

27.12

$

35.87

$

29.37

$

38.12

Natural gas equivalent ($ per mcfe)

$

4.23

$

5.08

$

4.02

$

5.70

 ?
Interest Expense (Income) ($ in millions):

Interest(a)

$

17

$

11

$

84

$

30

Derivatives ? realized (gains) losses

?

1

(1

)

7

Derivatives ? unrealized (gains) losses

 ?

(3

)

 ?

(5

)

 ?

(6

)

 ?

7

Total Interest Expense

$

14

$

7

$

77

$

44

 ?


(a) Net of amounts capitalized.


 ?

 ?

CHESAPEAKE ENERGY CORPORATION

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED CASH FLOW DATA

($ in millions)

(unaudited)


 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?
THREE MONTHS ENDED:December 31,December 31,

 ?
20122011

 ?
Beginning cash
$

142

$

111

 ?
Cash provided by operating activities
 ?

864

 ?

2,179

 ?
Cash flows from investing activities:
Well costs on proved and unproved properties
(1,377

)

(2,080

)
Acquisition of proved and unproved properties(a)
(295

)

(1,163

)
Sale of proved and unproved properties
3,386

1,257
Geological and geophysical costs
(28

)

(42


)

Additions to other property and equipment
(719

)

(593

)
Proceeds from sales of other assets
2,273

630
Additions to investments
(145

)

(25

)
Other
 ?

79

 ?

(81

)
Total cash provided by (used in) investing activities
 ?

3,174

 ?

(2,097

)

 ?
Cash provided by (used in) financing activities
 ?

(3,907

)

 ?

158

 ?
Change in cash and cash equivalents classified in current assets
held for sale

 ?

14

 ?

?

 ?
Ending cash
$

287

$

351

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?
TWELVE MONTHS ENDED:December 31,December 31,

 ?
20122011

 ?
Beginning cash
$

351

$

102

 ?
Cash provided by operating activities
 ?

2,841

 ?

5,903

 ?
Cash flows from investing activities:
Well costs on proved and unproved properties
(8,737

)

(7,257

)
Acquisition of proved and unproved properties(b)
(2,890

)

(4,463

)
Sale of proved and unproved properties
5,613

7,140
Geological and geophysical costs
(193

)

(210

)
Additions to other property and equipment
(2,635

)

(2,009

)
Proceeds from sales of other assets
2,492

1,312
Acquisition of drilling company
?

(339

)
Proceeds from (additions to) investments
(406

)

101
Proceeds from sale of midstream investment
2,000

?
Other
 ?

(224

)

 ?

(87

)
Total cash used in investing activities
 ?

(4,980

)

 ?

(5,812

)

 ?
Cash provided by financing activities
 ?

2,075

 ?

158

 ?

 ?
Ending cash
$

287

$

351

 ?


(a) Includes capitalized interest of $153 million and $152 million
for the current quarter and the prior quarter, respectively.


 ?

(b) Includes capitalized interest of $776 million and $630 million
for the current period and the prior period, respectively.

 ?

 ?

 ?

CHESAPEAKE ENERGY CORPORATION

RECONCILIATION OF OPERATING CASH FLOW AND EBITDA

($ in millions)

(unaudited)


 ?
December 31,September 30,December 31,
THREE MONTHS ENDED:
 ?
2012
 ?

 ?
2012
 ?

 ?
2011

 ?
CASH PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES
$

864

$

949

$

2,179

 ?
Changes in assets and liabilities
 ?

282

 ?

169

 ?

(868

)

 ?
OPERATING CASH FLOW(a)
$

1,146

$

1,118

$

1,311

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?
December 31,September 30,December 31,
THREE MONTHS ENDED:
 ?
2012
 ?

 ?
2012
 ?

 ?
2011

 ?
NET INCOME (LOSS)
$

344

$

(1,971

)

$

487

 ?
Income tax expense (benefit)
219

(1,260

)

312
Interest expense
14

36

7
Depreciation and amortization of other assets
71

66

85

Natural gas, oil and NGL depreciation, depletion and
amortization


 ?

651

 ?

762

 ?

484

 ?
EBITDA(b)
$

1,299

$

(2,367

)

$

1,375

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?
December 31,September 30,December 31,
THREE MONTHS ENDED:
 ?
2012
 ?

 ?
2012
 ?

 ?
2011

 ?
CASH PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES
$

864

$

949

$

2,179

 ?
Changes in assets and liabilities
282

169

(868

)
Interest expense
14

36

7

Unrealized gains (losses) on natural gas, oil and NGL
derivatives


125

(104

)

(345

)
Impairment of natural gas and oil properties
?

(3,315

)

?
Net gains (losses) on sales of fixed assets
272

(7

)

439
Impairments of fixed assets and other
(59

)

(14

)

(42

)
Gains (losses) on investments
(2

)

4

22
Stock-based compensation
(27

)

(30

)

(34

)
Losses on purchases of debt
(200

)

?

?
Other items
 ?

30

 ?

(55

)

 ?

17

 ?
EBITDA(b)
$

1,299

$

(2,367

)

$

1,375

 ?


(a) Operating cash flow represents net cash provided by operating
activities before changes in assets and liabilities. Operating
cash flow is presented because management believes it is a useful
adjunct to net cash provided by operating activities under
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States
(GAAP). Operating cash flow is widely accepted as a financial
indicator of a natural gas and oil company's ability to generate
cash which is used to internally fund exploration and development
activities and to service debt. This measure is widely used by
investors and rating agencies in the valuation, comparison, rating
and investment recommendations of companies within the natural gas
and oil exploration and production industry. Operating cash flow
is not a measure of financial performance under GAAP and should
not be considered as an alternative to cash flows from operating,
investing or financing activities as an indicator of cash flows,
or as a measure of liquidity.


 ?


(b) Ebitda represents net income (loss) before income tax expense,
interest expense and depreciation, depletion and amortization
expense. Ebitda is presented as a supplemental financial
measurement in the evaluation of our business. We believe that it
provides additional information regarding our ability to meet our
future debt service, capital expenditures and working capital
requirements. This measure is widely used by investors and rating
agencies in the valuation, comparison, rating and investment
recommendations of companies. Ebitda is also a financial
measurement that, with certain negotiated adjustments, is reported
to our lenders pursuant to our bank credit agreements and is used
in the financial covenants in our bank credit agreements. Ebitda
is not a measure of financial performance under GAAP. Accordingly,
it should not be considered as a substitute for net income, income
from operations, or cash flow provided by operating activities
prepared in accordance with GAAP.


 ?

CHESAPEAKE ENERGY CORPORATION

RECONCILIATION OF OPERATING CASH FLOW AND EBITDA

($ in millions)

(unaudited)


 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?
December 31,December 31,
TWELVE MONTHS ENDED:
 ?
2012
 ?
2011

 ?
CASH PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES
$

2,841

$

5,903

 ?
Changes in assets and liabilities
 ?

1,228

 ?

(594

)

 ?
OPERATING CASH FLOW(a)
$

4,069

$

5,309

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?
December 31,December 31,
TWELVE MONTHS ENDED:
 ?
2012
 ?
2011

 ?
NET INCOME (LOSS)
$

(594

)

$

1,757

 ?
Income tax expense (benefit)
(380

)

1,123
Interest expense
77

44
Depreciation and amortization of other assets
304

291
Natural gas, oil and NGL depreciation, depletion and amortization
 ?

2,507

 ?

1,632

 ?
EBITDA(b)
$

1,914

$

4,847

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?
December 31,December 31,
TWELVE MONTHS ENDED:
 ?
2012
 ?
2011

 ?
CASH PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES
$

2,841

$

5,903

 ?
Changes in assets and liabilities
1,228

(594

)
Interest expense
77

44
Unrealized gains (losses) on natural gas, oil and NGL derivatives
561

(789

)
Impairment of natural gas and oil properties
(3,315

)

?
Net gains on sales of fixed assets
267

437
Impairments of fixed assets and other
(316

)

(46)
Gains (losses) on investments
(180

)

41
Stock-based compensation
(120

)

(153

)
Gains on sales of investments
1,092

?
Losses on purchases of debt
(200

)

(5)
Other items
 ?

(21

)

 ?

9

 ?
EBITDA(b)
$

1,914

$

4,847

 ?

(a)Operating cash flow represents net cash provided by operating
activities before changes in assets and liabilities. Operating cash
flow is presented because management believes it is a useful adjunct
to net cash provided by operating activities under accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States (GAAP). Operating
cash flow is widely accepted as a financial indicator of a natural
gas and oil company's ability to generate cash which is used to
internally fund exploration and development activities and to
service debt. This measure is widely used by investors and rating
agencies in the valuation, comparison, rating and investment
recommendations of companies within the natural gas and oil
exploration and production industry. Operating cash flow is not a
measure of financial performance under GAAP and should not be
considered as an alternative to cash flows from operating, investing
or financing activities as an indicator of cash flows, or as a
measure of liquidity.

 ?

(b)Ebitda represents net income (loss) before income tax expense,
interest expense and depreciation, depletion and amortization
expense. Ebitda is presented as a supplemental financial measurement
in the evaluation of our business. We believe that it provides
additional information regarding our ability to meet our future debt
service, capital expenditures and working capital requirements. This
measure is widely used by investors and rating agencies in the
valuation, comparison, rating and investment recommendations of
companies. Ebitda is also a financial measurement that, with certain
negotiated adjustments, is reported to our lenders pursuant to our
bank credit agreements and is used in the financial covenants in our
bank credit agreements. Ebitda is not a measure of financial
performance under GAAP. Accordingly, it should not be considered as
a substitute for net income, income from operations or cash flow
provided by operating activities prepared in accordance with GAAP.

 ?

 ?

 ?

CHESAPEAKE ENERGY CORPORATION

RECONCILIATION OF ADJUSTED EBITDA

($ in millions)

(unaudited)


 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?
December 31,September 30,December 31,
THREE MONTHS ENDED:
 ?
2012
 ?

 ?
2012
 ?

 ?
2011

 ?
EBITDA
$

1,299

$

(2,367

)

$

1,375

 ?
Adjustments:
Unrealized (gains) losses on natural gas, oil and NGL derivatives
(125

)

104

345
Impairment of natural gas and oil properties
?

3,315

?
Net (gains) losses on sales of fixed assets
(272

)

7

(439

)
Impairments of fixed assets and other
59

38

42
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
(44

)

(41

)

(15

)
Gains on sales of investments
(31

)

(31

)

?
Losses on purchases of debt
200

?

?
Other
 ?

3

 ?

(4

)

 ?

?

 ?
Adjusted EBITDA(a)
$

1,089

$

1,021

$

1,308

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?
December 31,
 ?
December 31,
TWELVE MONTHS ENDED:
 ?
2012
 ?

 ?
2011

 ?
EBITDA
$

1,914

$

4,847

 ?
Adjustments:
Unrealized (gains) losses on natural gas, oil and NGL derivatives
(561

)

789
Impairment of natural gas and oil properties
3,315

?
Net gains on sales of fixed assets
(267

)

(437

)
Impairments of fixed assets and other
340

46
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
(175

)

(15

)
Losses on purchases of debt
200

176
(Gains) on investments
(1,019

)

?
Other
 ?

7

 ?

?

 ?
Adjusted EBITDA(a)
$

3,754

$

5,406

 ?


(a) Adjusted ebitda excludes certain items that management
believes affect the comparability of operating results. The
company believes these non-GAAP financial measures are a useful
adjunct to ebitda because:


 ?


(i) Management uses adjusted ebitda to evaluate the company's
operational trends and performance relative to other natural gas
and oil producing companies.


 ?


(ii) Adjusted ebitda is more comparable to estimates provided by
securities analysts.


 ?


(iii) Items excluded generally are one-time items or items whose
timing or amount cannot be reasonably estimated. Accordingly, any
guidance provided by the company generally excludes information
regarding these types of items.


 ?

 ?

 ?

CHESAPEAKE ENERGY CORPORATION

RECONCILIATION OF ADJUSTED NET INCOME AVAILABLE TO COMMON
STOCKHOLDERS

($ in millions, except per-share data)

(unaudited)


 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?
December 31,September 30,December 31,
THREE MONTHS ENDED:
 ?
2012
 ?

 ?
2012
 ?

 ?
2011

 ?
Net income (loss) available to common stockholders
$

257

$

(2,055

)

$

429

 ?
Adjustments, net of tax:
Unrealized (gains) losses on derivatives
(78

)

63

207
Impairment of natural gas and oil properties
?

2,022

?
Net (gains) losses on sales of fixed assets
(166

)

4

(268

)
Impairments of fixed assets and other
36

23

26
Gains on sales of investments
(19

)

(19

)

?
Losses on purchases or exchanges of debt
122

?

?
Other
 ?

1

 ?

(3

)

 ?

?

 ?
Adjusted net income available to common

stockholders(a)


153

35

394
Preferred stock dividends
 ?

43

 ?

43

 ?

43
Total adjusted net income
$

196

$

78

$

437

 ?
Weighted average fully diluted shares outstanding(b)
754

754

750

 ?
Adjusted earnings per share assuming dilution(a)
$

0.26

$

0.10

$

0.58

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?
December 31,
 ?
December 31,
TWELVE MONTHS ENDED:
 ?
2012
 ?

 ?
2011

 ?
Net income (loss) available to common stockholders
$

(940

)

$

1,570

 ?
Adjustments, net of tax:
Unrealized (gains) losses on derivatives
(347

)

486
Impairment of natural gas and oil properties
2,022

?
Net gains on sales of fixed assets
(163

)

(266

)
Impairments of fixed assets and other
208

28
Losses on purchases or exchanges of debt
122

107
Loss on foreign currency derivatives
?

11
Gains on investments
(622

)

?
Other
 ?

5

 ?

?

 ?
Adjusted net income available to common stockholders(a)
285

1,936
Preferred stock dividends
 ?

171

 ?

172
Total adjusted net income
$

456

$

2,108

 ?
Weighted average fully diluted shares outstanding(b)
755

752

 ?
Adjusted earnings per share assuming dilution(a)
$

0.61

$

2.80

 ?


(a) Adjusted net income available to common stockholders and
adjusted earnings per share assuming dilution exclude certain
items that management believes affect the comparability of
operating results. The company believes these non-GAAP financial
measures are a useful adjunct to GAAP earnings because:


 ?


(i) Management uses adjusted net income available to common
stockholders to evaluate the company's operational trends and
performance relative to other natural gas and oil producing
companies.


 ?


(ii) Adjusted net income available to common stockholders is more
comparable to earnings estimates provided by securities analysts.


 ?


(iii) Items excluded generally are one-time items or items whose
timing or amount cannot be reasonably estimated. Accordingly, any
guidance provided by the company generally excludes information
regarding these types of items.


 ?


(b) Weighted average fully diluted shares outstanding include
shares that were considered antidilutive for calculating earnings
per share in accordance with GAAP.


 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?
SCHEDULE 'A?
MANAGEMENT′S OUTLOOK AS OF FEBRUARY 21, 2013

 ?


Chesapeake periodically provides management guidance on certain
factors that affect its future financial performance. The primary
changes from the company′s November 1, 2012 Outlook are in
italicized bold and reflect estimated future production decreases
of approximately 35 bcfe in 2013 associated with the company′s
planned asset sales.


 ?
Chesapeake Energy Corporation Consolidated Projections

 ?

Year Ending


12/31/13


Estimated Production:

Natural gas ? bcf

1,030 ? 1,070

Oil ? mbbls

36,000 ? 38,000

NGL ? mbbls(a)

24,000 ? 26,000

Natural gas equivalent ? bcfe

1,390 ? 1,454

 ?

Daily natural gas equivalent midpoint ? mmcfe

3,895

 ?

YOY estimated production increase (adjusted for planned asset sales)
0%

 ?

NYMEX Price(b) (for calculation of realized hedging
effects only):

Natural gas - $/mcf
$3.67

Oil - $/bbl
$95.00

 ?

Estimated Realized Hedging Effects (based on assumed NYMEX prices
above):

Natural gas - $/mcf
($0.05)

Oil - $/bbl
$0.30

 ?

Estimated Gathering/Marketing/Transportation Differentials to NYMEX
Prices:

Natural gas - $/mcf

$1.15 ? 1.25

Oil - $/bbl
$0.00 ? 2.00

NGL - $/bbl
$66.00 ? 70.00

 ?

Operating Costs per Mcfe of Projected Production:

Production expense

$0.90 ? 0.95

Production taxes
$0.20 ? 0.25

General and administrative(c)
$0.34 ? 0.39

Stock-based compensation (noncash)

$0.04 ? 0.06

DD&A of natural gas and liquids assets

$1.65 ? 1.85

Depreciation of other assets

$0.25 ? 0.30

Interest expense(d)

$0.05 ? 0.10

 ?

Other ($ millions):

Marketing, gathering and compression net margin(e)
$90 ? 100

Oilfield services net margin(e)
$175 ? 225

Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests and other(f)
($180) ? (220)

 ?

Book Tax Rate

39%


 ?


Weighted average shares outstanding (in millions):

Basic

645 ? 650

Diluted

758 ? 763

 ?

Operating cash flow before changes in assets and liabilities(g)(h)
$4,850 ? 5,150

Well costs on proved and unproved properties

($5,750 ? 6,250)

Acquisition of unproved properties, net

($400)

 ?

a) Assumes no ethane rejection.


b) NYMEX natural gas and oil prices have been updated for actual
contract prices through February and January, respectively.


c) Excludes expenses associated with noncash stock-based
compensation.

d) Does not include unrealized gains or losses on interest rate
derivatives.


e) Includes revenue and operating costs and excludes depreciation
and amortization of other assets.


f) Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests of
Chesapeake Granite Wash Trust, CHK Utica, L.L.C. and CHK Cleveland
Tonkawa, L.L.C.


g) A non-GAAP financial measure. We are unable to provide a
reconciliation to projected cash provided by operating activities,
the most comparable GAAP measure, because of uncertainties
associated with projecting future changes in assets and
liabilities.


h) Assumes NYMEX prices on open contracts of $3.50 to $4.00 per
mcf and $95.00 per bbl in 2013.


 ?

Natural Gas, Oil and NGL Hedging Activities


Chesapeake enters into natural gas, oil and NGL derivative transactions
in order to mitigate a portion of its exposure to adverse changes in
market prices. Please see the quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and annual
reports on Form 10-K filed by Chesapeake with the SEC for detailed
information about derivative instruments the company uses, its
quarter-end derivative positions and the accounting for natural gas, oil
and NGL derivatives.


As of February 21, 2013, the company has the following open natural gas
swaps in place and gains (losses) related to closed natural gas trades
and premiums for call options for future production periods.


 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

Open


Swaps


(bcf)


 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

Avg. NYMEX


Price of


Open Swaps


 ?

 ?

 ?

Forecasted


Natural Gas


Production


(bcf)


 ?

 ?

Open Swap


Positions as


a % of


Forecasted


Natural Gas


Production


 ?

 ?

 ?


Total Gains


(Losses) from


Closed Trades


and Premiums


for Call Options


($ in millions)


 ?

 ?


Total Gains


(Losses) from


Closed Trades


and Premiums


for Call Options


per mcf of


Forecasted Natural Gas


Production


 ?

Q1 2013
53$3.72$(9)

Q2 2013
1373.6611

Q3 2013
1413.597

Q4 2013

 ?

 ?

 ?
141
 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?
3.59
 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?
(3)
 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

Total 2013

 ?

 ?

 ?
472
 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?
$3.63
 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

1,050

 ?

 ?
45%
 ?

 ?

 ?
$6
 ?

 ?

 ?

$

0.00

Total 2014

 ?

 ?

 ?

0

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

-

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

$

(74

)

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

Total 2015

 ?

 ?

 ?

0

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

-

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

$

(131

)

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

Total 2016 ? 2022

 ?

 ?

 ?

0

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

-

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?
$(187)
 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?


The company currently has the following purchased natural gas three-way
collars in place:


 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

Open


Collars


(bcf)


 ?

 ?

Avg. NYMEX


Sold Put Price


 ?

 ?


Avg. NYMEX


Bought Put Price


 ?

 ?


Avg. NYMEX


Ceiling Price


 ?

 ?


Forecasted


Natural Gas


Production (bcf)


 ?

 ?


Open Collars as


a % of


Forecasted


Natural Gas


Production


 ?

Q1 2013
0$-$-$-

Q2 2013
183.033.554.03

Q3 2013
183.033.554.03

Q4 2013

 ?

 ?
18
 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?
3.03
 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?
3.55
 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?
4.03
 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

Total 2013

 ?

 ?
54
 ?

 ?

 ?
$3.03
 ?

 ?

 ?
$3.55
 ?

 ?

 ?
$4.03
 ?

 ?

 ?

1,050

 ?

 ?

 ?
5%

 ?


The company currently has the following natural gas written call options
in place:


 ?

 ?

 ?

Call Options

(bcf)

 ?

 ?

Avg. NYMEX


Strike Price


 ?

 ?

Forecasted


Natural Gas


Production


(bcf)


 ?

 ?


Call Options


as a % of


Forecasted


Natural Gas


Production


 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

Q1 2013

0

$

-

Q2 2013

0

-

Q3 2013

0

-

Q4 2013

 ?

 ?

0

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

-

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

Total 2013

 ?

 ?

0

 ?

 ?

 ?

$

-

 ?

 ?

 ?

1,050

 ?

 ?

0%

Total 2014

 ?

 ?

0

 ?

 ?

 ?

$

-

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

Total 2015

 ?

 ?

0

 ?

 ?

 ?

$

-

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

Total 2016 ? 2020

 ?

 ?
193
 ?

 ?

 ?
$9.92
 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?


The company has the following natural gas basis protection swaps in
place:


 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

Volume (bcf)

 ?

 ?

Avg. NYMEX less

 ?

 ?

Q1 2013

11

$

0.21

Q2 2013

11

0.21

Q3 2013

11

0.21

Q4 2013

 ?

 ?

11

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

0.21

Total 2013

 ?

 ?

44

 ?

 ?

 ?

$

0.21

Total 2014

 ?

 ?

28

 ?

 ?

 ?

$

0.32

Total 2015

 ?

 ?
31
 ?

 ?

 ?
$0.34

Total 2016-2022

 ?

 ?
8
 ?

 ?

 ?
$1.02

 ?


As of February 21, 2013, the company has the following open crude oil
swaps in place and gains (losses) related to closed crude oil contracts
and premiums for call options for future production:


 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

Open


Swaps


(mbbls)


 ?

 ?

Avg. NYMEX


Price of


Open Swaps


 ?

 ?

Forecasted


Oil


Production


(mbbls)


 ?

 ?

Open Swap


Positions as


a % of


Forecasted


Oil


Production


 ?

 ?


Total Gains


(Losses) from


Closed Trades


and Premiums


for Call Options


($ in millions)


 ?

 ?


Total Gains (Losses) from


Closed Trades


and Premiums


for Call Options


per bbl of


Forecasted Oil


Production


 ?

Q1 2013
6,401$95.52
$

1

Q2 2013
7,93595.56
1

Q3 2013
8,45195.42
2

Q4 2013

 ?

 ?
8,796
 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?
95.33
 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

2

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

Total 2013

 ?

 ?
31,583
 ?

 ?

 ?
$95.45
 ?

 ?

 ?

37,000

 ?

 ?

 ?
85%
 ?

 ?

$

6

 ?

 ?

 ?

$

0.17

Total 2014

 ?

 ?
18,073
 ?

 ?

 ?
$93.67
 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

$

(151

)

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

Total 2015

 ?

 ?

500

 ?

 ?

 ?

$

88.75

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

$

265

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

Total 2016 ? 2022

 ?

 ?

0

 ?

 ?

 ?

$

-

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

$

117

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?


The company currently has the following crude oil written call options
in place:


 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

Call Options

(mbbls)

 ?

 ?

Avg. NYMEX


Strike Price


 ?

 ?

Forecasted


Oil


Production


(mbbls)


 ?

 ?

Call Options


as a % of


Forecasted Oil


Production


 ?

Q1 2013
2,125$98.09

Q2 2013
1,95497.90

Q3 2013
1,97597.90

Q4 2013

 ?

 ?
1,975
 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?
97.90
 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

Total 2013

 ?

 ?
8,029
 ?

 ?

 ?
$97.95
 ?

 ?

 ?

37,000

 ?

 ?

 ?
22%

Total 2014

 ?

 ?

17,612

 ?

 ?

 ?

$

98.79

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

Total 2015

 ?

 ?

27,048

 ?

 ?

 ?

$

100.99

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

Total 2016 ? 2017

 ?

 ?

24,220

 ?

 ?

 ?

$

100.07

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?


The company has the following oil basis protection swaps in place:


 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

Volume (mbbls)

 ?

 ?

Avg. NYMEX plus

 ?

 ?

Q1 2013
2,340$15.09

Q2 2013
2,45712.34

Q3 2013
73610.07

Q4 2013

 ?

 ?
0
 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?
-

Total 2013

 ?

 ?
5,533
 ?

 ?

 ?
$13.20

 ?

 ?

 ?
SCHEDULE 'B?
MANAGEMENT′S OUTLOOK AS OF NOVEMBER 1, 2012
(PROVIDED FOR REFERENCE ONLY)
NOW SUPERSEDED BY OUTLOOK AS OF FEBRUARY 21, 2013

 ?

 ?


Chesapeake periodically provides management guidance on certain
factors that affect its future financial performance. The primary
changes from the company′s August 6, 2012 Outlook reflect
estimated natural gas curtailments of approximately 60 bcf in the
2012 first half and also include estimated future production
decreases of approximately 45 bcfe in 2012 and 140 bcfe in 2013
associated with the company′s completed and planned asset sales.
Management and the board of directors continue to review
operational plans for 2013 and beyond which could result in
changes to this Outlook.


 ?
Chesapeake Energy Corporation Consolidated Projections
For Years Ending December 31, 2012 and 2013

 ?

Year Ending


12/31/12


Year Ending


12/31/13


Estimated Production:

Natural gas ? bcf

1,120 ? 1,140

1,030 ? 1,070

Oil ? mbbls

30,000 ? 31,000

36,000 ? 38,000

NGL ? mbbls

17,000 ? 18,000

24,000 ? 26,000

Natural gas equivalent ? bcfe

1,402 ? 1,434

1,390 ? 1,454

 ?

Daily natural gas equivalent midpoint ? mmcfe

3,870

3,895

 ?

YOY estimated production increase (adjusted for planned asset sales)

18%

1%

 ?

NYMEX Price(a) (for calculation of realized hedging
effects only):

Natural gas - $/mcf

$2.77

$4.00

Oil - $/bbl

$94.66

$90.00

 ?

Estimated Realized Hedging Effects (based on assumed NYMEX prices
above):

Natural gas - $/mcf

$0.30

$0.00

Oil - $/bbl

$0.99

$4.50

 ?

Estimated Gathering/Marketing/Transportation Differentials to NYMEX
Prices:

Natural gas - $/mcf

$1.00 ?1.10

$1.15 ? 1.25

Oil - $/bbl

$4.50 ? 6.50

$4.50 ? 6.50

NGL - $/bbl

$67.00 ? 70.00

$63.00 ? 67.00

 ?

Operating Costs per Mcfe of Projected Production:

Production expense

$0.90 ? 1.00

$0.90 ? 1.00

Production taxes (~5% of O&G revenues)

$0.15 ? 0.20

$0.25 ? 0.30

General and administrative(b)

$0.39 ? 0.44

$0.39 ? 0.44

Stock-based compensation (noncash)

$0.04 ? 0.06

$0.04 ? 0.06

DD&A of natural gas and liquids assets

$1.65 ? 1.85

$1.65 ? 1.85

Depreciation of other assets

$0.22 ? 0.27

$0.25 ? 0.30

Interest expense(c)

$0.05 ? 0.10

$0.05 ? 0.10

 ?

Other ($ millions):

Marketing, gathering and compression net margin(d)

$90 ? 100

$50 ? 75

Oilfield services net margin(d)

$175 ? 200

$200 ? 250

Other income (including certain equity investments)

$25

?

Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest(e)

($180) ? (200)

($200) ? (240)

 ?

Book Tax Rate

39%

39%


 ?


Weighted average shares outstanding (in millions):

Basic

640 ? 645

645 ? 650

Diluted

753 ? 758

758 ? 763

 ?

Operating cash flow before changes in assets and liabilities(f)(g)

$3,800

$4,250 ? 5,250

Well costs on proved and unproved properties

($8,750)

($5,750 ? 6,250)

Acquisition of unproved properties, net

($1,750)

($400)

 ?


a) NYMEX natural gas and oil prices have been updated for actual
contract prices through October and September, respectively.


b) Excludes expenses associated with noncash stock-based
compensation.

c) Does not include unrealized gains or losses on interest rate
derivatives.

d) Includes revenue and operating costs and excludes depreciation
and amortization of other assets.


e) Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests of
Chesapeake Granite Wash Trust, CHK Utica, L.L.C., CHK Cleveland
Tonkawa, L.L.C. and Cardinal Gas Services, L.L.C.


f) A non-GAAP financial measure. We are unable to provide a
reconciliation to projected cash provided by operating activities,
the most comparable GAAP measure, because of uncertainties
associated with projecting future changes in assets and liabilities.

g) Assumes NYMEX prices on open contracts of $3.50 per mcf and
$90.00 per bbl in 2012 and $3.50 to $4.50 per mcf and $90.00 per bbl
in 2013.

 ?

Natural Gas, Oil and NGL Hedging Activities


Chesapeake enters into natural gas, oil and NGL derivative transactions
in order to mitigate a portion of its exposure to adverse changes in
market prices. Please see the quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and annual
reports on Form 10-K filed by Chesapeake with the SEC for detailed
information about derivative instruments the company uses, its
quarter-end derivative positions and the accounting for natural gas, oil
and NGL derivatives.


As of November 1, 2012, the company has the following open natural gas
swaps in place and gains (losses) related to closed natural gas trades
and premiums for call options for future production periods.


 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?


 ?


 ?

 ?

Open Swaps

(bcf)

 ?

 ?

Avg. NYMEX


Price of


Open Swaps


 ?

 ?

Forecasted


Natural Gas


Production


(bcf)


 ?

 ?

Open Swap


Positions


as a % of


Forecasted


Natural Gas


Production


 ?

 ?


Total Gains


(Losses) from


Closed Trades


and Premiums


for Call


Options


($ in millions)


 ?

 ?


Total Gains from


Closed Trades


and Premiums for


Call Options


per mcf of


Forecasted


Natural Gas


Production


Q4 2012

 ?

 ?

215

 ?

 ?

 ?

$

3.06

 ?

 ?

 ?

281

 ?

 ?

 ?

76

%

 ?

 ?

$

15

 ?

 ?

 ?

$

0.05

 ?

Q1 2013

0

$

(11

)

Q2 2013

0

8

Q3 2013

0

6

Q4 2013

 ?

 ?

0

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

(3

)

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

Total 2013

 ?

 ?

0

 ?

 ?

 ?

$

0.00

 ?

 ?

 ?

1,050

 ?

 ?

 ?

0

%

 ?

 ?

$

0

 ?

 ?

 ?

$

0.00

Total 2014

 ?

 ?

0

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

$

(74

)

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

Total 2015

 ?

 ?

0

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

$

(131

)

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

Total 2016 ? 2022

 ?

 ?

0

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

$

(161

)

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?


The company currently has the following natural gas written call options
in place:


 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

Call Options

(bcf)

 ?

 ?

Avg. NYMEX


Strike Price


 ?

 ?

Forecasted


Natural Gas


Production


(bcf)


 ?

 ?

Call Options


as a % of


Forecasted


Natural Gas


Production


Q4 2012

 ?

 ?

40

 ?

 ?

 ?

$

3.25

 ?

 ?

 ?

281

 ?

 ?

 ?

14

%

 ?

Total 2013

 ?

 ?

0

 ?

 ?

 ?

$

0.00

 ?

 ?

 ?

1,050

 ?

 ?

 ?

0

%

Total 2014

 ?

 ?

0

 ?

 ?

 ?

$

0.00

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

Total 2015

 ?

 ?

0

 ?

 ?

 ?

$

0.00

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

Total 2016 ? 2020

 ?

 ?

260

 ?

 ?

 ?

$

8.90

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?


The company currently has the following purchased natural gas put
swaptions in place:


 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

Put Swaptions

(bcf)

 ?

 ?

Avg. NYMEX


Price of Swap


 ?

 ?

Forecasted


Natural Gas


Production


(bcf)


 ?

 ?

Put Swaption


as a % of


Forecasted


Natural Gas


Production


Q1 2013

8

$

3.66

Q2 2013

10

$

3.64

Q3 2013

2

$

3.50

Q4 2013

 ?

 ?

0

 ?

 ?

 ?

$

0.00

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

Total 2013

 ?

 ?

20

 ?

 ?

 ?

$

3.64

 ?

 ?

 ?

1,050

 ?

 ?

 ?

2

%

 ?


The company has the following natural gas basis protection swaps in
place:


 ?

 ?

 ?

Volume (Bcf)

 ?

 ?

Avg. NYMEX less

Q4 2012

 ?

 ?

8

 ?

 ?

 ?

$

0.74

 ?

2013

 ?

 ?

44

 ?

 ?

 ?

$

0.21

2014

 ?

 ?

28

 ?

 ?

 ?

$

0.32

2015 - 2022

 ?

 ?

40

 ?

 ?

 ?

$

0.48

 ?


As of November 1, 2012, the company has the following open crude oil
swaps in place and gains (losses) related to closed crude oil contracts
and premiums for call options for future production periods (note: the
company also has 5,000 bbls per day of propane call options in Q4 2012):


 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

Open


Swaps


(mbbls)


 ?

 ?

Avg. NYMEX


Price of


Open Swaps


 ?

 ?

Forecasted


Oil


Production


(mbbls)


 ?

 ?

Open Swap


Positions as


a % of


Forecasted


Oil


Production


 ?

 ?


Total Gains


(Losses) from


Closed Trades


and Premiums


for Call


Options


($ in millions)


 ?

 ?

 ?


Total Gains


(Losses) from


Closed Trades


and Premiums


for Call Options


per bbl of


Forecasted Oil


Production


Q4 2012

 ?

 ?

6,197

 ?

 ?

 ?

$

99.14

 ?

 ?

 ?

8,171

 ?

 ?

 ?

76

%

 ?

 ?

$

(31

)

 ?

 ?

 ?

$

(3.83

)

 ?

Q1 2013

5,647

95.95

$

1

Q2 2013

6,672

96.10

$

1

Q3 2013

6,687

96.02

$

2

Q4 2013

 ?

 ?

6,662

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

95.97

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

$

2

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

Total 2013

 ?

 ?

25,668

 ?

 ?

 ?

$

96.01

 ?

 ?

 ?

37,000

 ?

 ?

 ?

69

%

 ?

 ?

$

6

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

$

0.17

 ?

Total 2014

 ?

 ?

918

 ?

 ?

 ?

$

90.85

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

$

(151

)

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

Total 2015

 ?

 ?

500

 ?

 ?

 ?

$

88.75

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

$

265

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

Total 2016 ? 2021

 ?

 ?

0

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

$

117

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?


The company currently has the following crude oil written call options
in place:


 ?

 ?

 ?

Call Options

(mbbls)

 ?

 ?

Avg. NYMEX


Strike Price


 ?

 ?

Forecasted


Oil


Production


(mbbls)


 ?

 ?

Call Options


as a % of


Forecasted Oil


Production


 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

Q4 2012

 ?

 ?

0

 ?

 ?

 ?

$

--

 ?

 ?

 ?

8,171

 ?

 ?

 ?

0

%

 ?

Q1 2013

3,390

$

99.56

Q2 2013

3,428

$

99.56

Q3 2013

3,006

$

98.62

Q4 2013

 ?

 ?

3,006

 ?

 ?

 ?

$

98.62

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

Total 2013

 ?

 ?

12,830

 ?

 ?

 ?

$

99.12

 ?

 ?

 ?

37,000

 ?

 ?

 ?

35

%

Total 2014

 ?

 ?

17,612

 ?

 ?

 ?

$

98.79

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

Total 2015

 ?

 ?

27,048

 ?

 ?

 ?

$

100.99

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

Total 2016 ? 2017

 ?

 ?

24,220

 ?

 ?

 ?

$

100.07

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?


The company has the following oil basis protection swaps in place:


 ?

 ?

 ?

Volume (mbbls)

 ?

 ?

Avg. NYMEX plus

Q4 2012

 ?

 ?

951

 ?

 ?

 ?

$

17.70

 ?

Q1 2013

2,070

$

14.99

Q2 2013

 ?

 ?

1,365

 ?

 ?

 ?

$

12.55

Total 2013

 ?

 ?

3,435

 ?

 ?

 ?

$

14.02

 ?


Chesapeake Energy Corporation

Investor Contacts:

Jeffrey L.
Mobley, CFA, 405-767-4763

jeff.mobley@chk.com

or

Gary
T. Clark, CFA, 405-935-6741

gary.clark@chk.com

or

Media
Contacts:

Michael Kehs, 405-935-2560

michael.kehs@chk.com

or

Jim
Gipson, 405-935-1310

jim.gipson@chk.com



Bewerten 
A A A
PDF Versenden Drucken

Für den Inhalt des Beitrages ist allein der Autor verantwortlich bzw. die aufgeführte Quelle. Bild- oder Filmrechte liegen beim Autor/Quelle bzw. bei der vom ihm benannten Quelle. Bei Übersetzungen können Fehler nicht ausgeschlossen werden. Der vertretene Standpunkt eines Autors spiegelt generell nicht die Meinung des Webseiten-Betreibers wieder. Mittels der Veröffentlichung will dieser lediglich ein pluralistisches Meinungsbild darstellen. Direkte oder indirekte Aussagen in einem Beitrag stellen keinerlei Aufforderung zum Kauf-/Verkauf von Wertpapieren dar. Wir wehren uns gegen jede Form von Hass, Diskriminierung und Verletzung der Menschenwürde. Beachten Sie bitte auch unsere AGB/Disclaimer!



Unternehmen dieses Artikels
Unternehmen Land WKN Symbol Profil News News, engl. Forum Details
Chesapeake Energy Corp. USA USA A2P232 CHK      
© 2007 - 2025 Rohstoff-Welt.de ist ein Mitglied der GoldSeiten Mediengruppe
Es wird keinerlei Haftung für die Richtigkeit der Angaben übernommen! Alle Angaben ohne Gewähr!
Kursdaten: Data Supplied by BSB-Software.de (mind. 15 min zeitverzögert)